LEFT is RIGHT (blogging against The Bush-war) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
###
Iraq War Cost
![]() ![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() Buy it Here for $12.95 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ::::: MY PROFILE ::::: VIDEO: When the Good Guys Do NOTHING Welcome to the New World Order Truth, War & Consequences In the Name of Freedom Oreo Calculator Army of One Remind Us One Year THANKS ESSAY/SITE: Bush's 40/IRAQ/SOTU/OTHER Lies A Declaration of Progressive Principles A Declaration of Impeachment World's Leading Terrorist Why Bush Invaded Iraq Coalition Deaths in Iraq Altruism is Out of Focus Official Bush Lie Outlet The Devil's Handbook Third World Traveler Paying for Wal-mart Those Elusive WMDs Ongoing Scandals The Bush Record Bush Scorecard Who Served Halliburton AWOL Evil
![]() I reserve the right to publish your e-mail.
Archives ![]() ![]() My Ecosystem Details Who's Linking to Left is Right Who links to me? Who's on Left is Right right now # Visits by day of month Most Recent Visitors Recent Visitors by Location United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights Humanist Manifesto III ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The Brand New Bag Books about the Iraq War |
![]() Front Pages / 10 x 10 / Open Secrets / VillageVoice / The New Standard / The Hill / Washington Note
|
....My opponent has been spending some time with his base as well -- most recently, he attended a gala with his Hollywood friends. Evidently, things got a little out of hand. My name came up a few times. And now the Senator refuses to release a tape of that whole enchanted evening. Could be that his friends, whom he said conveyed the "heart and soul of America," actually embarrassed themselves and the candidate.... |
....Over the next four years we will continue to defend our homeland, we'll continue to defeat the terrorists abroad. Yet, in the long run, our safety requires something more. We must work to change the conditions that give rise to terror in the Middle East: the poverty, and the hopelessness, and the resentments that terrorists too often exploit. Life in that region will be far more hopeful and peaceful when men and women can choose their own leaders, when the people can decide their own future. A free and peaceful Iraq, a free and peaceful Afghanistan will be powerful examples to their neighbors. Free countries do not export terror. Free countries do not stifle the dreams of their citizens. By serving the ideal of liberty, we are bringing hope to others, and that makes America more secure.... |
....Shree K. Nayar, a professor of computer science and co-director of the Columbia Vision and Graphics Center, took high-resolution photographs of people that include their eyes and, in particular, the transparent part of the eye called the cornea. Then, with a postdoctoral researcher, Ko Nishino, he devised computer algorithms that analyze the images reflected in these natural mirrors, revealing a wealth of information. The system can automatically recover wide-angle views of what people are looking at, including panoramic details to the left, right and even slightly behind them. It can also calculate where people are gazing - for instance, at a single smiling face in a crowd. Because the algorithms can track exactly where a person is looking, the system may one day find use in surveillance cameras that spot suspicious behavior or in interfaces for quadriplegics who use their gaze to operate a computer. Dr. Nishino and Dr. Nayar plan to try their corneal imaging system with archival photographs. "It will be fascinating to go back and look at photographs of important people like John Kennedy," Dr. Nayar said. "From a single image of the eye, we may be able to figure out what was around him and what he was looking at.".... |
Bush ran on "restoring dignity" to the White House. He did none of that. Kerry is running on "restoring truth and credibility to the White House". Nice way to turn Bush's 2000 rhetoric against him. |
New Political Organization to be Launched in Boston: Progressive Democrats of America [PDA} WASHINGTON - July 20- A new political organization will be officially launched next week in Boston, at the conclusion of the Democratic National Convention. The group, Progressive Democrats of America (PDA), will reflect a broad desire by many within the Democratic Party to champion progressive issues, along with working to defeat President George Bush. PDA has already won the support of well-known activists and political figures such as Tom Hayden, and actors Ed Asner and Mimi Kennedy. "The Democratic Party needs our help to regain its soul," said Kennedy, who has been a supporter of grassroots efforts. "If this is to be the party of peace, of universal, single payer healthcare, of fair trade, then it needs people to speak out on those issues." PDA will work to mobilize supporters within the Democratic Party on behalf of progressive office holders, including public servants and Democratic Party officials. "There are many progressives, newly energized by the Dean and Kucinich campaigns, who are also new to the Democratic Party. We're going to do the hard work of integrating them into the party and shifting the balance of power in the progressive direction," adds Charles Lenchner, acting director of PDA.... |
Study finds that the economy now matters little to prospective voters By UC Berkeley's Survey Research Center | 28 July 2004 BERKELEY � The economy is fading as an issue in the forefront of Americans' minds as they decide between the two major party presidential candidates. And increasingly, potential voters are turning their attention to other issues, especially "family values." That is the latest result of the Public Agendas and Citizen Engagement Survey (PACES) - a nationwide survey and joint venture of the University of California, Berkeley, Indiana University and the University of Maryland. "Whereas Iraq and the economy were sucking the life out of any other issues in the campaign earlier on, now both of those concerns have subsided some as sore points - to a modest extent in the case of Iraq, but to a great extent in the case of the U.S. economy," said Douglas Strand, the PACES project manager and a political science lecturer at UC Berkeley. "So far, Iraq continues to be a leading factor in the election, but Americans now appear to be giving a good deal of attention to the debates around traditional family values in the United States, probably because of the increased talk about 'values' by the two campaigns and especially because of the resurgence, at least for a time, of the gay marriage issue as the Constitutional ban came up for debates and votes in Congress." The survey indicates that economic assessments have taken a dive in their influence on the choice that Americans are making between Bush and Kerry when the analysts compare two things: what the people interviewed said about the state of the economy and which candidate each of them then said they preferred for president. For example, when the investigators looked at those interviewed who called themselves independents - identifying with no political party and much more likely than partisans to be "swing voters" - 28 percent preferred Kerry in the interviews done between mid-February and May 7 if they were optimistic about the economy over the year to come. But 54 percent of the independents preferred Kerry if they saw the economy negatively - a 26 percent rise in support for Kerry associated with a negative instead of a positive view. Recently, however, in the interviews conducted between May 8 to July 25, 33 percent of the optimistic independents preferred Kerry, while support for Kerry among the pessimistic independents was 39 percent. In other words, now Kerry appears to get a much smaller boost in support - six percent instead of 26 percent - when these independents are pessimistic about the future of the economy. The electoral importance of economic assessments dropped even more once the analysts took into account the opinions expressed on many other issues that may affect how people vote, such as views on terrorism, abortion, health care, gay marriage and the war in Iraq. In the survey as a whole, the overall fall in the importance of economic assessments is both large and statistically significant. And while assessments of the economy mattered much less, the level of negativism about the economy also decreased, though to a lesser extent. In the mid-February to early-May period, 46 percent of all Americans in the survey said they thought the United States was either "not too close" or "a long way" from having a "strong economy." But in the more recent period, since early May, 38 percent took such a negative view of the current state of the economy. The date of May 8 was chosen as a dividing line for comparison because that is the day when the Bush campaign got its second round of good economic news: Almost 300,000 new jobs were reported, and unemployment dropped a 10th of a percentage point. The previous round of good news, in early April, did not seem to undercut the support Kerry garnered from economic pessimism, probably, the analysts suspect, because the good news appeared too tentative. "It appears that the better economic news since early May has not only reduced the percentage of the public that is gloomy about the future of the economy, but it has also inhibited the tendency of the pessimists to direct their disgruntlement at Bush," said Strand. Meanwhile, the analysts found that family values has surged as a set of issues that Americans consider when they decide between Bush and Kerry. Earlier in the year, these issues mattered much less. In the case of health care, the evidence was only suggestive and the increased importance appeared to center on the question of whether Medicare drug benefits should be extended to all seniors. The PACES scholars said they need more interviews in the future to confirm the increased importance of this issue in the election. But in the survey, the increased importance of family values was clear, and most of this appeared to come from the increased importance of gay marriage, in particular. In the February to early May period, if independents supported a Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, then 40 percent supported Bush instead of Kerry. But if independents opposed such an amendment, then support for Bush fell to 28 percent - a 12 percent difference. Since May 8, however, if independents supported that same amendment, then they were stronger in their support for Bush - by a margin of 20 percent - compared to those opposing the amendment. This is roughly twice as large a difference as before. Merrill Shanks, the principal investigator for the project and a UC Berkeley political science professor, noted that the economy may rise again as an important issue if the "short-term sluggishness" that Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan referred to continues into the fall, or if Kerry is successful in making his case that the employment gains in the economy have been too limited. "For now, however, it appears that Bush has made at least one gain in the campaign," Shanks said, "for the economy no longer appears to drag him down much, if at all, when Americans think about who they would vote for if the election were held today." |
(Christian Zionists) believe that the Holy Land will be ground zero for events surrounding the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. Such people read the Bible as though it were a huge jigsaw puzzle of prophecies, with Israel in the center. They believe that human history is following a predetermined divine script, and they and Israel are simply playing their assigned roles. These beliefs come out of the complex system of biblical interpretation know as dispensationalism. |
Dear Mike, (Please forward this to your friends and family) There are 435 members of the U.S. House of Representatives. Would you please make one phone call to help keep marriage [from] being between [only] one man and one woman? Call your Representative and ask him or her to vote [against] If it passes in the House, it will go back to the Senate. Click here to get the direct phone number of your Representative. There are even some local numbers listed. Or, you can reach your Representative through the capitol switchboard at 202-224-3121. If he or she is listed as being "unknown" ask them to vote [against] Would you please call today? Thanks. Working together we can work wonders! Your phone call makes a difference. Several Representatives have already contacted us because of calls from their constituents. Sincerely, Donald E. Wildmon, Founder and Chairman American Family Association |
....Now that the Convention is underway and the November elections loom just around the corner, you, Dennis, and everyone else from the Democratic Party, have launched a united campaign to rally all of us behind the Kerry ticket, whatever it does or does not stand for. We recognize, as you do Dennis, what is at stake in this election. We recognize, as you do, Dennis, that Mr. Kerry, is another Lesser Evil in a succession of elections between one Evil and another. We also recognize that for Mr. Kerry to woo the Left might cost him votes on the Right and Center, and that to satisfy all, he may satisfy none. And we recognize that when Mr. Kerry squeaks out his win in November the Democrats - that is the DLC Democrats - will claim a Mandate for their neo-liberal policies that the Left detests, and the Muckamucks will party and snicker and congratulate themselves for, once again, having roped in their wayward lefty mice. We do not begrudge the Party its party. We, too, will lift a glass to the demise, and we will dream (forlornly) of criminal trials, here and abroad, for the present administration. Nevertheless, we want something from the Democratic Party, Dennis. We want more than a pat on the head for being good little boys and girls who have returned home after running away for a while. We are not children any more; we want adult political rewards for our role in returning the (Hold Your Noses) DLC business-as-usual Democrats back to power. We want more than just the rumor of a possibility of a chance of a few scraps of access to the second and third tiers of Power. We want, in other words, to be assured of some significant influence and tangible results for our effort. Dennis, we thank you for the experience and for the wisdom we learned while working in your campaign. However, you have not the authority to tell us for whom to vote in November. We might vote for Ralph Nader or we might vote for John Kerry or we might vote for a Third Party or we might not vote at all. Who we will vote for is still our choice, and we will not make that decision until The Last Minute. In the meanwhile, Dennis, tell the Leaders of the Democratic Party who are now your pals: If they want our votes, if they want to win in November, then they need to show us what tangible results we will achieve, specifically what we will gain, and how our issues and concerns will be advanced if we are to help Mr. Kerry get elected. Our votes are here. Let Mr. Kerry come and earn them. |
Fear of Fraud - By PAUL KRUGMAN - Published: July 27, 2004 It's election night, and early returns suggest trouble for the incumbent. Then, mysteriously, the vote count stops and observers from the challenger's campaign see employees of a voting-machine company, one wearing a badge that identifies him as a county official, typing instructions at computers with access to the vote-tabulating software. When the count resumes, the incumbent pulls ahead. The challenger demands an investigation. But there are no ballots to recount, and election officials allied with the incumbent refuse to release data that could shed light on whether there was tampering with the electronic records. This isn't a paranoid fantasy. It's a true account of a recent election in Riverside County, Calif., reported by Andrew Gumbel of the British newspaper The Independent. Mr. Gumbel's full-length report, printed in Los Angeles City Beat, makes hair-raising reading not just because it reinforces concerns about touch-screen voting, but also because it shows how easily officials can stonewall after a suspect election. Some states, worried about the potential for abuse with voting machines that leave no paper trail, have banned their use this November. But Florida, which may well decide the presidential race, is not among those states, and last month state officials rejected a request to allow independent audits of the machines' integrity. A spokesman for Gov. Jeb Bush accused those seeking audits of trying to "undermine voters' confidence," and declared, "The governor has every confidence in the Department of State and the Division of Elections." Should the public share that confidence? Consider the felon list. Florida law denies the vote to convicted felons. In 2000 the state hired a firm to purge supposed felons from the list of registered voters; these voters were turned away from the polls. After the election, determined by 537 votes, it became clear that thousands of people had been wrongly disenfranchised. Since those misidentified as felons were disproportionately Democratic-leaning African-Americans, these errors may have put George W. Bush in the White House. This year, Florida again hired a private company - Accenture, which recently got a homeland security contract worth up to $10 billion - to prepare a felon list. Remembering 2000, journalists sought copies. State officials stonewalled, but a judge eventually ordered the list released. The Miami Herald quickly discovered that 2,100 citizens who had been granted clemency, restoring their voting rights, were nonetheless on the banned-voter list. Then The Sarasota Herald-Tribune discovered that only 61 of more than 47,000 supposed felons were Hispanic. So the list would have wrongly disenfranchised many legitimate African-American voters, while wrongly enfranchising many Hispanic felons. It escaped nobody's attention that in Florida, Hispanic voters tend to support Republicans. After first denying any systematic problem, state officials declared it an innocent mistake. They told Accenture to match a list of registered voters to a list of felons, flagging anyone whose name, date of birth and race was the same on both lists. They didn't realize, they said, that this would automatically miss felons who identified themselves as Hispanic because that category exists on voter rolls but not in state criminal records. But employees of a company that prepared earlier felon lists say that they repeatedly warned state election officials about that very problem. Let's not be coy. Jeb Bush says he won't allow an independent examination of voting machines because he has "every confidence" in his handpicked election officials. Yet those officials have a history of slipshod performance on other matters related to voting and somehow their errors always end up favoring Republicans. Why should anyone trust their verdict on the integrity of voting machines, when another convenient mistake could deliver a Republican victory in a high-stakes national election? This shouldn't be a partisan issue. Think about what a tainted election would do to America's sense of itself, and its role in the world. In the face of official stonewalling, doubters probably wouldn't be able to prove one way or the other whether the vote count was distorted - but if the result looked suspicious, most of the world and many Americans would believe the worst. I'll write soon about what can be done in the few weeks that remain, but here's a first step: if Governor Bush cares at all about the future of the nation, as well as his family's political fortunes, he will allow that independent audit. |
July 28, 2004 Bush Plan Excludes Public From Environmental Review A new directive proposed by the Bush administration would grant broad environmental exemptions to numerous government agencies under the guise of national security. It would also exclude the American public from decisions that can have long-term health and environmental consequences. Under directives for carrying out the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), agencies such as the Coast Guard, Border Patrol, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and many others would be given "categorical exemptions" from following federal environmental regulations if they invoke reasons of national security. Such exclusions would enable agencies to conduct activities in secret that could have serious implications for public safety - such as using or storing hazardous chemicals in close proximity to residential areas and schools without letting citizens know about their risk of exposure. The directive would also allow the degradation of public resources -- such as the building of new roads through national forests for use by the Border Patrol -- with no input from the public whatsoever. While these agencies would still have to conduct environmental reviews before taking action, those reviews would not be subject to public scrutiny or public comment.... |
"Strength and wisdom are not conflicting values�they go hand in hand." |
�Slave masters never changed their minds, the enslaved changed theirs.� |
"Voting is like praying: It just might work." |
....Apparently, the nuts at the Democratic National Convention are going to be put in cages outside the convention hall. Sadly, they won't be fighting to the death as is done in WWE caged matches. They're calling this the "protestor's area," although I suppose a better name would be the "truth-free zone". ....I thought this was a great idea until I realized the �nut� category did not include Sharpton, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, and Teddy Kennedy -- all featured speakers at the convention. I�d say the actual policy is only untelegenic nuts get the cages, but little Dennis Kucinich is speaking at the Convention, too. So it must be cages for �nuts who have not run for president as serious candidates for the Democratic Party.� Looking at the line-up of speakers at the Convention, I have developed the 7-11 challenge: I will quit making fun of, for example, Dennis Kucinich, if he can prove he can run a 7-11 properly for 8 hours. We�ll even let him have an hour or so of preparation before we open up. Within 8 hours, the money will be gone, the store will be empty, and he�ll be explaining how three 11-year olds came in and asked for the money and he gave it to them.... |
In the dank back room of an East Village bar, Teresa Hommel, assisted by a laptop and projector, fervently warned a gathering of Democrats last week that the Republican Party could steal the November election. Then she demonstrated how. Using a computer simulation she herself programmed, called the "Fraudulent Voting Machine," Hommel tried to show how the software in electronic voting machines, which will be used by as many as a third of American voters in the November election, could be manipulated to produce phony results. The program, which is available on Hommel's website, wheresthepaper.org, is simple enough: A user chooses, and then verifies, a vote either for candidate John Doe or candidate Mary Smith. No matter how the user votes, Mary Smith always wins. "Anything in a computer can be changed," said Hommel, who has worked with computers for over 30 years. She's devoted the past year solely to the voting issue. She talks about voter-verified paper audits of the new machines�a primary demand of many advocates�with an enthusiasm that borders on zeal. "The [electronic machines] are being sold as a panacea, on the basis that you can trust them," she said. "The people selling them are lying." There are a number of reasons why the new machines, Direct Recording Electronic Voting Systems (known as DREs), are viewed so suspiciously, by so many. There is the legacy of the contested Florida results during the 2000 presidential election, and the comments of Wally O'Dell, the CEO of Diebold Inc., a manufacturer of DREs. In a fundraising letter he sent to Ohio Republicans last August, O'Dell wrote that he was committed "to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year." But as concern with the security of the upcoming election grows, the window in which changes can be made is slamming shut. Aides to several members of Congress admitted that legislation that would require the electronic machines to produce a paper audit trail will probably go nowhere during the current session. This means that a security regimen will be a voluntary, unfunded project, undertaken by state election officials rather than mandated by the federal government.... |
BUSH REELECTED!! |
....imagine yourself an Iraqi. You've suffered terribly under a ruthless dictator. The Americans invade your country under false pretenses. They promise democracy but don't organize elections. They appoint exiles to rule you, exiles who spend most of their time out of the country and the rest in a few highly protected areas. The occupiers break into your homes in the middle of the night and arrest your men, who then disappear, with no accountability. They shoot Iraqis at roadblocks and from convoys. They declare war on the second most popular man in the country, announcing his death in advance. They open the economy to US corporations and give them sweetheart contracts, ignoring local business. Then they write hundreds of laws and establish commissions limiting any future government. They build permanent military bases on your soil. Then they turn your country over to a former associate of Saddam Hussein, also a former CIA agent, known for his ruthless brutality. Imagine that was your country. What would you do? |
ZNet | Iraq The Saddam-ist / Islamist Resistance Will Win - by Scott Ritter; July 24, 2004 The battle for Iraq's sovereign future is a battle for the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people. As things stand, it appears that victory will go to the side most in tune with the reality of the Iraqi society of today: the leaders of the anti-U.S. resistance. ....The Iraqi resistance is no emerging "marriage of convenience," but rather a product of years of planning. Rather than being absorbed by a larger Islamist movement, Saddam's former lieutenants are calling the shots in Iraq, having co-opted the Islamic fundamentalists years ago, with or without their knowledge. One look at the list of the 55 "most wanted" members of the Saddam regime who remain at large reveals the probable chain of command of the Iraqi resistance today. It also underscores the success of Saddam's strategic decision nearly a decade ago to disassociate himself from Baathist ideology. Keep in mind that there was never a formal surrender ceremony after the U.S. took control of Baghdad. The security services of Saddam's Iraq were never disbanded; they simply melted away into the population, to be called back into service when and where they were needed. ....The transfer of sovereignty to the new Iraqi government of Iyad Allawi is a charade that will play itself out over the next weeks and months, and with tragic consequences. Allawi's government, hand-picked by the United States from the ranks of anti-Saddam expatriates, lacks not only a constituency inside Iraq but also legitimacy in the eyes of many ordinary Iraqi citizens. The truth is that there never was a significant people- based opposition movement inside Iraq for the Bush administration to call on to form a government to replace Saddam. It is why the United States has instead been forced to rely on the services of individuals tainted by their association with foreign intelligence services, or drawn from opposition parties heavily infiltrated by agents of Saddam's former security services. Regardless of the number of troops the United States puts on the ground or how long they stay there, Allawi's government is doomed to fail. The more it fails, the more it will have to rely on the United States to prop it up. The more the United States props up Allawi, the more discredited he will become in the eyes of the Iraqi people - all of which creates yet more opportunities for the Iraqi resistance to exploit. We will suffer a decade-long nightmare that will lead to the deaths of thousands more Americans and tens of thousands of Iraqis. We will witness the creation of a viable and dangerous anti-American movement in Iraq that will one day watch as American troops unilaterally withdraw from Iraq every bit as ignominiously as Israel did from Lebanon. The calculus is quite simple: the sooner we bring our forces home, the weaker this movement will be. And, of course, the obverse is true: the longer we stay, the stronger and more enduring this byproduct of Bush's elective war on Iraq will be. There is no elegant solution to our Iraqi debacle. It is no longer a question of winning but rather of mitigating defeat. |
....The only way for the US and UK and other foreign troops to get out of Iraq is for an Iraqi army to be reestablished pronto. The only way to do that pronto is essentially to bring back the Baath army. I'd say bringing back the non-dirty Baath regular army may be the best near-term solution, if the politics of it can be resolved; it isn't happening with any rapidity. Allawi may be trying to do that, but remember that the Kurds and the Sadrist Shiites won't exactly be elated, and the country could break up over it. To repeat, this is not Bush's mess. This is America's mess. It is not going away, there are no good options, and it may go terribly wrong on Kerry if he is elected. It is not my job to give you good news or make you feel better about the future. My American readers may as well understand that their country is caught in quicksand in Iraq and Afghanistan, and nobody is there to throw us a rope.... |
�I think every day the press reports that President Bush wants tax cuts and some jerks in the Senate don�t is a good day for Bush and a bad day for jerks in the Senate.� ---Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist |
....It is important to remember that George Bush, while a top contender for title of Biggest Flop in American History, is largely a spent force. It is difficult to see what else he could possibly do to damage the planet. Once, not very long ago, his presidential Brain Trust, the neo-con Nazis, advocated mopping up Syria, Iran, and other places whose names they couldn't even pronounce as soon as they finished up in Iraq. Well, things are not going to finish up any time soon in Iraq. America has spent herself silly trying to stabilize Iraq after de-stabilizing it. There is a distasteful quality about Bush that people all over the world instinctively feel, and Bush's efforts, we may all be thankful, will continue being hindered by that perception. Kerry has the advantage of being utterly boring instead of distasteful, but his ideas about the world are remarkably similar to Bush's. If Americans elect Kerry, they will get a fresh, new Bush who may actually be able to leverage some of the world's recent weariness and desperate desire for change to carry right on with more destructive stupidity.... |
Just add urine ... It seems DARPA's doing everything it can these days to make the prospect of joining the armed forces as unattractive as possible. In February it was reported that the agency was hard at work on a drug that will allow soldiers to fight for up to five days without eating a single meal. Now comes news that it's developed a dried food ration that troops can be hydrated with urine. Can you imagine fighting without food for five days and then having your first meal be one cooked in your own urine? Sort of give news meaning to the the phrase "urinal cake." |
....In a briefing given in late September 2001, Ronald Dick, assistant director of the FBI and head of the United States National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC), told reporters that the hijackers of 9/11 had used the Internet, and "used it well." Since 9/11, terrorists have only sharpened their Internet skills and increased their web presence. Today, terrorists of very different ideological persuasions�Islamist, Marxist, nationalist, separatist, racist�have learned many of the same lessons about how to make the most of the Internet. The great virtues of the Internet�ease of access, lack of regulation, vast potential audiences, fast flow of information, and so forth�have been turned to the advantage of groups committed to terrorizing societies to achieve their goals.... |
OUR MISSION The WISH List raises funds to identify, train and elect pro-choice Republican women at all levels of government -- local, state and national. WISH invites you to join us in identifying, training, supporting and electing a steady stream of Republican women who share our values. OUR VISION for the 21st Century Our vision is to create a powerful force of Political Partners whose financial support ensures the continuous election of pro-choice Republican women to positions at all levels of government across America. |
"....I've tried to improve myself with every book and find the truth inside the lie. Sometimes I have succeeded. I salute the National Book Foundation Board, who took a huge risk in giving this award to a man many people see as a rich hack. For far too long the so-called popular writers of this country and the so-called literary writers have stared at each other with animosity and a willful lack of understanding. This is the way it has always been. Witness my childish resentment of anyone who ever got a Guggenheim. But giving an award like this to a guy like me suggests that in the future things don't have to be the way they've always been. Bridges can be built between the so-called popular fiction and the so-called literary fiction. The first gainers in such a widening of interest would be the readers, of course, which is us because writers are almost always readers and listeners first. You have been very good and patient listeners and I'm going to let you go soon but I'd like to say one more thing before I do. Tokenism is not allowed. You can't sit back, give a self satisfied sigh and say, "Ah, that takes care of the troublesome pop lit question. In another twenty years or perhaps thirty, we'll give this award to another writer who sells enough books to make the best seller lists." It's not good enough. Nor do I have any patience with or use for those who make a point of pride in saying they've never read anything by John Grisham, Tom Clancy, Mary Higgins Clark or any other popular writer. What do you think? You get social or academic brownie points for deliberately staying out of touch with your own culture? Never in life, as Capt. Lucky Jack Aubrey would say. And if your only point of reference for Jack Aubrey is the Australian actor, Russell Crowe, shame on you...." |
Neocon Riots Rock DC |
....You have to wonder if the Bush-Cheney campaign is drawing its strategic direction from celebrity pundits Joe Trippi and Arianna Huffington, who've been circulating a petition urging John Kerry to stop worrying about those pesky and stubbornly centrist swing voters and try to win by exciting the Democratic base and attracting ill-defined non-voters. Fortunately, Kerry is ignoring that advice.... |
....There is a sense of lawlessness, of desperation, among the Republican party right now. It is no longer a question of simply which party will run the show or which platform will have the most influence on policy. Rather, it's about a radically polarized worldview: are we going to be an aggressive macho globally disrespected isolationist nation who has burned all bridges and molested all foreign relationships and mocked all global sympathy, or are we, as the GOP wants you to believe, going to become some liberal namby-pamby country where gays can marry each other and sexually deviant women can have abortions every day and everybody speaks French? Because there is no middle ground. This is the GOP message. You are either with us, or you are a terrorist. You are either on the side of the "patriotic," pro-war party of WMD lies and homophobia and violence toward the global community, or you're a liberal hippie 'Nam protester like that jerknose Kerry. What else could they do to guarantee a November win? What are they capable of, in the wake of 2000's stolen election and the rigging of the Florida recounts and a sneering, despoiled Supreme Court? Just about anything, really..... ....So then, let this be a warning. Get ready. Expect the unexpected. Watch the skies, scrutinize the headlines, dust off your stash of duct tape. Because Karl Rove and the cutthroat BushCo war hawks and corporate cronies who run the show aren't about to go down without a screaming, sickening, fiery fight. And if BushCo has proven anything in the past four violent, budget-gutting, honor-molesting, nearly unbearable years, it's that there ain't no international law that can't be broken, no fear synapse that can't be hammered to death, no fraudulent power tactic that can't be abused. Anything is possible. You have been warned.... |
July 20, 2004 Mr. Ralph Nader Nader for President 2004 PO Box 18002 Washington, DC 20036 Dear Mr. Nader, The Hubert Humphrey Democratic Club of Cerritos and surrounding communities has, at its July meeting, overwhelmingly passed a resolution requesting that you exit the 2004 presidential race. Prior to passing the resolution, the club�s members had a serious and open discussion, where we compared and contrasted the electoral systems in the United States to the system in Europe. Europe has a proportional representative democracy, where each party has the same proportional representation in the parliament as the proportional vote it won in the election. To form a majority, the different parties, each one with its own agenda, must form a coalition amongst the different parties. In the United States, our electoral system is set up so that the winner gets everything, and all others get nothing. Therefore, coalitions are formed within the parties, in order to win the elections. The Democratic party is a coalition of Environmentalists, Pro Workers, Pro-Choice Advocates, Common Sense Gun Control Advocates, First Amendment Advocates, Advocates for the poor and elderly, and Civil Rights Advocates. The Democratic Party is big enough and diverse enough to allow you to find your niche within the party. Please join us in our mission to send George W. Bush back to Crawford this November. The Republicans have their house in order. They convinced Roy Moore, the "Ten Commandments Judge" from Alabama, not to run for president as the nominee of the Constitution Party, in order to prevent splitting the Conservative vote. After getting their house in order, the Republicans are now trying to wreck our house, by funding efforts to put you on the ballot in as many states as possible, in order to help George W. Bush maintain control of the White House. Please Don�t Run, Ralph !! Sincerely, Vice President, Hubert H. Humphrey Democratic Club |
Dear Mike, Senator Tom Daschle, Senate Minority leader, was the one person who held the liberals together to filibuster the Federal Marriage Amendment, thus keeping the American people from having a vote in this matter. Sen. Daschle is leading the fight to use our children and grandchildren as guinea pigs in a grand social experiment promoting homosexual marriage. You see, if the people are kept from voting, then some liberal federal judge will rule that homosexual marriage is legal and throw out the marriage laws in 50 states. That is precisely what Sen. Daschle is trying to do. He is willing to sacrifice our children and grandchildren to get the big money and a handful of votes from the homosexual activists.... |
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Singer Linda Ronstadt was thrown out of the Aladdin casino in Las Vegas on the weekend after dedicating a song to liberal film maker Michael Moore and his movie "Fahrenheit 9/11," a casino spokeswoman said on Monday. Ronstadt, who had been hired for a one-show engagement Saturday night at the Las Vegas Strip casino, dedicated a performance of "Desperado" to Moore and his controversial documentary, which criticizes President Bush and the U.S.-led war in Iraq. That dedication angered some Aladdin guests who spilled drinks, tore down posters and demanded their money back, said casino spokeswoman Sara Gorgon. "We had quite a scene at the box office," she said. About a quarter of the 4,500 people in the audience got up and left before the performance had finished, Gorgon said. Before her concert, Ronstadt had laughingly told the Las Vegas Review-Journal that she hoped that the casino performance would be her last. "I keep hoping that if I'm annoying enough to them, they won't hire me back," she was quoted as telling the newspaper. A statement issued by the Aladdin said Ronstadt had been "escorted out of the hotel" just after her performance and said the performer would "not be welcomed back." "Ms. Ronstadt was hired to entertain the guests of the Aladdin, not to espouse political views," the casino said. Ronstadt was not immediately available for comment. |
....Revelation is must reading nowadays, especially for the nonbeliever. I have returned to it, many years after abandoning the above-mentioned childhood faith, not because I think it is inspired prophecy, there being in my opinion no such thing, but because many other people (including many I'd grant are "good" people) think that it is. And because some of them think this piece of Holy Scripture somehow justifies ongoing imperialist war, which they (with their commander-in-chief) conceptualize religiously as a war of Good versus Evil. And because that conviction causes believers to support, on faith, Bush's efforts to remold the Middle East in the way the neocons (who are overwhelmingly not fundamentalist Christians, but who assiduously court them) want to do it. One should read Revelation to see how it can be used, and to see what sort of worldview the book encourages. It is truly a godsend to those in the administration who want to transform the Muslim world, acquiring strategic control over Southwest Asia while enhancing Israel's security situation, that a considerable portion of the U.S. population consists of persons who take the book seriously. The neocons and patrons manipulate the Christian devout who adulate Ariel Sharon like a rock star, believe Israel (miraculously reconstituted half a century ago, in fulfillment of Ezekiel 37:12-14) can do no wrong, have little concern about Arabs' rights, and think Islam is a teaching of the Devil. Rev. Jerry Falwell calls the Prophet Muhammed a "terrorist." Rev. Franklin Graham calls Islam "a wicked, evil religion" and says its God is not the Christians' God. These reverends' followers are very useful supporters of the war on the human mind that is the "war on terrorism," the focus of which shifted so swiftly from al-Qaeda to Iraq (alike in little save their Muslimness), and could shift to Syria or Iran or Pakistan suddenly tomorrow. When you mix the anti-Islam pronouncements with Bush policy decisions and millenarian faith, you have an explosive combination.... |
July 20, 2004 |
"Conservatives believe man was created in God's image, while liberals believe they are gods. All of the behavioral tics of the liberals proceed from their godless belief that they can murder the unborn because they, the liberals, are themselves gods. They try to forcibly create 'equality' through affirmative action and wealth redistribution because they are gods. They flat-out lie, with no higher power to constrain them, because they are gods. They adore pornography and the mechanization of sex because man is just an animal, and they are gods. They revere the UN and not the U.S. because they aren't Americans -- they are gods." --Ann Coulter |
In just 3 days last week, you sent 17,000 e-mails to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, the top Republican in the Senate, to tell him to stop blocking a vote on the Assault Weapons Ban. We want to send 20,000 more today to Dr. Frist and to House Speaker Dennis Hastert. Click here to send an e-mail to Dr. Frist and Speaker Hastert With only 9 legislative days left until the ban expires, the Republican leadership needs to get a strong message: schedule a vote on the assault weapons ban renewal NOW. This weekend both the New York Times and the Washington Post joined 25 other newspapers from around the country urging the Republicans to stop blocking the renewal. Keep up the pressure on Dr. Frist and Speaker Hastert. Tell them it's on their shoulders. If this ban expires, it will be their legacy to the country. |
Fri Jul 16, 2004 03:39 PM ET NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - The amount of television watched as a child is directly related to the risk of health problems as an adult, new research shows. Although previous reports have linked childhood television viewing with adverse health, no long-term studies have looked at the effects on adult health, lead author Dr. Robert J. Hancox and colleagues, from the University of Otago in Dunedin, New Zealand, note in The Lancet medical journal. The team studied 1000 subjects who were born in Dunedin in the early 1970s and followed at regular intervals until 26 years of age. Television viewing was assessed with interviews conducted at 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 21 years of age. Television viewing between the ages of 5 and 15 years increased the risk of high cholesterol levels, smoking, poor fitness, and being overweight in adulthood. In contrast, such viewing had no effect on the risk of high blood pressure. On a population level, the authors estimate that 17 percent of overweight, 15 percent of poor fitness, 15 percent of elevated cholesterol, and 17 percent of current smoking in 26-year-olds could be attributed to watching more than 2 hours per day of television during childhood and adolescence. "Our results suggest that excessive television viewing in young people is likely to have far-reaching consequences for adult health," the authors conclude. "We concur with the American Academy of Pediatrics that parents should limit children's viewing to 1 to 2 hours per day; in fact, data suggest that less than 1 hour a day would be even better." In a related editorial, Drs. David S. Ludwig and Steven L. Gortmaker, from Harvard Medical School in Boston, note that "a likely explanation for these findings is that dietary and other lifestyle habits learned in childhood and influenced by television continue into adulthood. Ultimately, parents must reclaim from television the responsibility for educating and entertaining their young children." SOURCE: The Lancet, July 17, 2004. |
....William G. Myers III, formerly a top lobbyist for the beef and mining industries, has been nominated by President Bush for a seat on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Perhaps the nation's most significant appeals court when it comes to environmental precedents, the 9th Circuit covers nine western states which include some 489 million acres of federal public lands. ....Myers, who has never participated in a jury trial, nor been a judge at any level, was rated "not qualified" by over one-third of the American Bar Association's standing committee on the federal judiciary. Not one member gave him a "well qualified" rating. Myers is opposed by an unprecedented coalition of some 180 tribal leaders, conservation groups, labor and civil rights organizations. For the first time in its 68-year history, the conservative National Wildlife Federation chose to oppose a president's judicial nominee. The reasons for such intense opposition are not hard to find. Myers has argued in court that the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act are unconstitutional, and that there is no constitutional basis for the U.S. government to protect wetlands. He has compared management of the public's federal lands to "the tyrannical actions of King George in levying taxes" on the American colonies. In one of his two formal opinions as solicitor at Interior, Myers argued that the Bureau of Land Management does not have the authority to prevent undue degradation of public lands resulting from mining operations.... |
By Jack Brubaker - Lancaster New Era - Published: Jul 16, 2004 12:55 PM EST LANCASTER COUNTY, PA - President Bush met privately with a group of Old Order Amish during his visit to Lancaster County last Friday. He discussed their farms and their hats and his religion. He asked them to vote for him in November. The Amish told the president that not all members of the church vote but they would pray for him. Bush had tears in his eyes when he replied. He said the president needs their prayers. He also said that having a strong belief in God is the only way he can do his job. This story has not been reported before. You might think an observant press follows the president everywhere, especially during a re-election campaign, but no reporter attended this meeting. Sam Stoltzfus, an Old Order historian and writer who lives in Gordonville, spoke with a number of people present at the session with the president. He related what happened to the Scribbler, saying the Amish �caught Bush�s heart.�� The 20-minute meeting with Bush occurred immediately after the president addressed a select audience at Lapp Electric Service in Smoketown Friday afternoon. An Amish woman who lives on a farm across Witmer Road from Lapp Electric that morning had presented a quilt to the president with a card thanking him for his leadership of the country. Bush said he would like to talk to the quilter and her family. So the Secret Service invited the family to meet the president. Friends wanted to come along, and the entire assembly eventually numbered about 60. They were evenly divided between adults and children of all ages. The group walked together across the road to Lapp Electric. Stoltzfus reports: �It took a while to get them through the metal detectors as these were farmers and shop men, with vice grips, pocket knives, and nuts and bolts in their pockets. Some ladies had baby gear. All pockets had to be emptied.�� When the Amish were �found not to be a serious threat to national security,�� they were allowed inside the office area of Lapp Electric and waited about 30 minutes for the president to appear. �Babies got restless. Children squirmed,�� Stoltzfus reports. �Suddenly the president and five Secret Service men stepped into the room. One housewife said, �Are you George Bush?��� The president replied in the affirmative and shook hands all around, asking the names of all. He especially thanked the �quilt frau,�� who operates her own business selling quilts and crafts. �He seemed relaxed and just like an old neighbor,�� says Stoltzfus. Bush said he had never met any Amish before and was curious about why the men were wearing straw hats rather than black wool hats. The Amish explained that they wear cooler straw in summer. Bush tried on a hat. The president commented on the appearance of Amish farms, and an Amish man spoke apologetically about how he and his friends were not expecting to see the president and were wearing soiled work clothes. Bush said he did not mind that. Another man remarked that he has twin daughters, as does Bush. The man said one of his twins had dreamed the night before that she was shaking hands with the president and now she actually had done that. �One of the young girls wanted to give Bush a whoopie pie cookie,�� Stoltzfus says. �Bush declined it. The Secret Service man took it, as presidents aren�t supposed to eat untested food.�� At the end of the session, Bush reportedly told the group, �I trust God speaks through me. Without that, I couldn�t do my job.�� As the president left the room, one Amish man wished him good luck in November. �The Amish group headed back to their farms and shops,�� reports Stoltzfus. �Mothers took their children home for a nap and went back to their sewing and gardens.�� Bush moved along to an appearance in York County, leaving behind a group of Old Order admirers who have tales to tell for the rest of their lives.... |
More and more news publications are putting up registration pages. Whenever I encounter such a page, I create an account that you are all welcome to share. It's either: Login: dailykos Password: dailykos or if the login is an email address, then Login: kos@dailykos.com Password: dailykos Many of you have already created accounts at sites all over the place. I have gotten into many a newspaper using those passwords even though I hadn't create the account. But if you run across a site that doesn't have a "dailykos" account setup, do us all the favor of setting up such an account. It'll make our web surfing efforts much more efficient and enjoyable. |
....What we're witnessing in health care is a national tragedy. Everyone has a scapegoat -- grotesque administrative costs, lawsuits, bad doctors, stupid regulations, insulation of patients from actual costs, you name it. And every scapegoat surely does play a role in a system that costs vastly more every year but delivers increasingly questionable results, with more and more people finding themselves under-insured or not insured at all. So no one is at fault. And everyone is at fault. California will see a bruising fight this fall over a ballot proposition aimed at overturning last year's "California Health Insurance Act" (SB2), which will require employers with more than 50 employees to offer health coverage to workers. Business groups have correctly said this will be a deterrent to job formation in the state, but that's only part of the story. Even a big state like California can only work at the margins of a system that demands national attention. This is an American issue, not a California or Indiana or Maine issue. It's a national issue for many reasons, not least of which is the matter of offshoring. Companies send work outside the United States in part because health care is a taxpayer-funded service in other nations, giving foreign companies another built-in advantage over U.S. firms. But it's a national issue because we simply can't continue the way we're going for much longer. Employers are growing desperate for change. So are the again-growing ranks of the uninsured, and the hospitals that are forced to care for them without sufficient repayment, and the doctors who are losing money on some Medicare patients, and on and on. Some believe the choice is stark, between a system with a large number of insured people who get quality care and another large segment that get nothing, and a single-payer national system that has all the benefits and flaws of typically government-run programs. I think we can do better with an amalgam, a system that forces consumers to bear more costs of routine treatment while offering a safety net for catastrophic problems. I also think the health insurance industry as it exists today is one of the biggest barriers to making this work.... |
"....Blood, blood. I feel covered with the sticky stuff. The streets of Iraq are wet with blood. Skulls are crushed. Limbs shredded. Brains smeared onto walls. The screams of the dying, of the maimed are ricocheting down the alleys of Cairo, Riyadh, Jeddah, Mecca, Medina, Teheran, Damascus, Basra, Baghdad, Mosul, Najaf, Amman, Beirut, Nablus, Hebron, Ramallah, Sanaa, Islamabad, Kandahar and Kabul. Are those screams also being heard in Chicago, Los Angeles, Washington, DC, New York, Boston, San Francisco, St. Louis, Cincinnati, Detroit, Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, Seattle and San Diego? My heart is as heavy as lead. My tax dollar splits open human beings, miraculous beings, whose main offense is location. By a nasty quirk of fate, they sit on the strategic prize, the world's second largest reserve of oil. Iraq, my annual IRS tithe feeds the machines that destroy you. The fruits of my labor, skimmed off by the Pentagon, blasts bits of human flesh into the rubble. How do we retain our humanity if we don't do more than read (or write) about the growing disaster? How do we go beyond the despairing e-mails to friends, the conversations over dinner in which we express our dismay, but do not take the next step into meaningful action? What is meaningful action now? Even if we occasionally go to a march, a protest, a meeting or an independent film, surely this is not enough as the US military/government becomes ever more out-of-control, ever more vicious. How do we express our outrage inside an electoral system that has spawned John Kerry, a Democratic imperialist who now out does Bush in terms of "stay the course" and "send in more troops" rhetoric? Isn't it time for men and women of decency to say no more business as usual? ...." Mina Hamilton |
Dear MoveOn member, Over the last two days, more than 400,000 people have signed our petition calling on Congress to take a stand against President Bush's politics of division. It's an incredible, overwhelming response. But supporters of the amendment have also flooded Capitol Hill with petitions, and we only have a few more hours to show Congress that the American people don't want the Consitution to be used as a partisan political weapon. Please sign the petition at.: http://www.moveon.org/unitednotdivided/ Please also pass it along to others who you think would be supportive. Delivering 500,000 signatures to President Bush and the Senate today will send a powerful message. Our original alert is below. Thanks. --Carrie, Joan, Lee, Marika, Noah, Peter, and Wes The MoveOn.org Team Wednesday, July 14th, 2004 |
"Our lives begin to end the day that we remain silent about things that matter." Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. |
July 12, 2004 Mary Beth Cahill Campaign Manager John Kerry for President P.O. Box 34640 Washington, DC 20043 Dear Ms. Cahill: On Thursday your campaign hosted a fundraiser at Radio City Music Hall at which Sen. Kerry said, "Every performer tonight in their own way either verbally through their music through their lyrics have conveyed to you the heart and soul of our country." I called on your campaign to release the performance that Sen. Kerry said represented the "heart and soul" of America so that all Americans could see for themselves what John Kerry thinks represents the "heart and soul" of our country.... ....I have been assured that "fair use" rules of copyright would allow you to release the tapes of these musical performances to the news media under 2 U.S.C. 107. To allay the other concern you relayed to the news media, Bush-Cheney '04 pledges to refrain from using audio, video or transcripts of the event for any television, cable, satellite or radio advertising. We look forward to seeing this spirited display. Sincerely, Ken Mehlman Campaign Manager |
....THIS IS A TIME of testing - for people of faith and for people who believe in democracy. How do we nurture the healing side of religion over the killing side? How do we protect the soul of democracy against the contagion of a triumphalist theology in the service of an imperial state? At stake is America's role in the world. At stake is the very character of the American Experiment - whether "we, the people" is the political incarnation of a spiritual truth - one nation, indivisible - or a stupendous fraud. There are two Americas today. You could see this division in a little-noticed action this spring in the House of Representatives. Republicans in the House approved new tax credits for the children of families earning as much as $309,000 a year - families that already enjoy significant benefits from earlier tax cuts - while doing next to nothing for those at the low end of the income scale. This, said The Washington Post in an editorial called "Leave No Rich Child Behind," is "bad social policy, bad tax policy, and bad fiscal policy. You'd think they'd be embarrassed but they're not." Nothing seems to embarrass the political class in Washington today. Not the fact that more children are growing up in poverty in America than in any other industrial nation; not the fact that millions of workers are actually making less money today in real dollars than they did 20 years ago; not the fact that working people are putting in longer and longer hours just to stay in place; not the fact that while we have the most advanced medical care in the world, nearly 44 million Americans - eight out of 10 of them in working families - are uninsured and cannot get the basic care they need. Nor is the political class embarrassed by the fact that the gap between rich and poor is greater than it's been in 50 years - the worst inequality among all Western nations. They don't seem to have noticed that we have been experiencing a shift in poverty. For years it was said that single jobless mothers are down there at the bottom. For years it was said that work, education, and marriage is how they move up the economic ladder. But poverty is showing up where we didn't expect it - among families that include two parents, a worker, and a head of the household with more than a high school education. These are the newly poor. These are the people our political and business class expects to climb out of poverty on an escalator moving downward. For years now a small fraction of American households have been garnering an extreme concentration of wealth and income while large corporations and financial institutions have obtained unprecedented levels of economic and political power over daily life. In 1960, the gap in terms of wealth between the top 20 percent and the bottom 20 percent was 30-fold. Four decades later it is more than 75-fold. Such concentrations of wealth would be far less of an issue if the rest of society was benefiting proportionately and equality was growing. That's not the case. As an organization called The Commonwealth Foundation Center for the Renewal of American Democracy sets forth in well-documented research, working families and the poor "are losing ground under economic pressures that deeply affect household stability, family dynamics, social mobility, political participation, and civic life." And household economics "is not the only area where inequality is growing in America." We are also losing the historic balance between wealth and commonwealth. The report goes on to describe "a fanatical drive to dismantle the political institutions, the legal and statutory canons, and the intellectual and cultural frameworks that have shaped public responsibility for social harms arising from the excesses of private power." That drive is succeeding, with drastic consequences for an equitable access to and control of public resources, the lifeblood of any democracy. From land, water, and other natural resources to media and the broadcast and digital spectrums, to scientific discovery and medical breakthroughs, and even to politics itself, a broad range of the American commons is undergoing a powerful shift in the direction of private control. And what is driving this shift? Contrary to what you learned in civics class in high school, it is not the so-called "democratic debate." That is merely a cynical charade behind which the real business goes on - the none-too-scrupulous business of getting and keeping power so that you can divide up the spoils. If you want to know what's changing America, follow the money. Veteran Washington reporter Elizabeth Drew says "the greatest change in Washington over the past 25 years - in its culture, in the way it does business and the ever-burgeoning amount of business transactions that go on here - has been in the preoccupation with money." Jeffrey Birnbaum, who covered Washington for nearly 20 years for the Wall Street Journal, put it even more strongly: "[Campaign cash] has flooded over the gunwales of the ship of state and threatens to sink the entire vessel. Political donations determine the course and speed of many government actions that deeply affect our daily lives." It is widely accepted in Washington today that there is nothing wrong with a democracy dominated by the people with money. But of course there is. Money has democracy in a stranglehold and is suffocating it. During his brief campaign in 2000, before he was ambushed by the dirty tricks of the Religious Right in South Carolina and big money from George W. Bush's wealthy elites, John McCain said elections today are nothing less than an "influence peddling scheme in which both parties compete to stay in office by selling the country to the highest bidder.".... |
"....Thirdly, one of the interesting issues that we're confronted with here in the country is that if a state decides to redefine marriage, people who are then married in that state can come to a state like Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania must accept that marriage. Now, that is right now protected, what's called the Defense of Marriage Act, signed by President Clinton. But there's a lot of legal experts who tell me that that act is going to be struck down in the court of law, which would then mean that a court could decide, redefine marriage -- a court -- the people would get married, and they'd come to another state and say, you must accept me -- us as a married couple, which then redefines the marriage in the new state...." George W. Bush in Kutztown, Pennsylvania, July 9, 2004 |
Anger at US ban on Aids scientists Bangkok conference forced to cancel meetings and retract papers after authors stopped from attending Sarah Boseley in Bangkok - Monday July 12, 2004 The Guardian The US government came under scathing attack from senior members of the medical establishment yesterday for blocking scientists from attending the International Aids conference which opened in Bangkok. The biennial conference, with 17,000 delegates, is more political rally than scientific meeting and bears huge significance for those involved in the fight against HIV/Aids. The US government has sent only a fraction of its usual contingent of scientists, pleading cost - 50 instead of the 236 who attended the last event in Barcelona in 2002. The Department of Health and Human Services, headed by the health secretary, Tommy Thompson, was yesterday accused of actively preventing certain US scientists and doctors who had a contribution to make from travelling to Bangkok. Many suspect that behind the action lies a rift between the US and Aids activists who oppose America's approach to the global pandemic. Joep Lange, president of the Sweden-based International Aids Society, which organises the conference, said it had been forced to retract papers that had been accepted for conference sessions after the US scientist authors had been refused permission to come. Many meetings, some to train developing world researchers, have had to be cancelled. "I really think it is shameful that they restricted the US government participation, particularly when you think they are putting so much money into the fight and people in the field who have to do the job are directly prevented from coming here," said Dr Lange.... |
....A more morally sound strategy � and also, quite possibly, a more politically sound strategy � would be for Kerry to point up the way the president fails to honor the faithful and trifles with them by turning them into cogs in a political machine. Remind Americans that Bush has lectured Catholic cardinals like they were precinct captains � complaining to one in Vatican City, "Not all the American bishops are with me." Point out how he has arranged privileged White House briefings on Mideast policy with apocalyptic Christians who are more interested in fulfilling the divisive conditions they say will hasten the Rapture than actual peace in this world. Put on display the way the Bush campaign has walked the razor's edge of campaign law by instructing conservative churches to send their membership rosters to Bush/Cheney headquarters. Or, if that's not what Kerry feels in his heart, he can just keep doing what he's been doing: rehearsing the same familiar invocations of the Almighty that presidential candidates always have (even if it isn't really fair to nonbelievers, who hardly deserve the implied second-class citizenship). |
Bolinas woman mobilizes moms to change country Tricia Cambron, Special to The Chronicle - Friday, July 9, 2004 The fact that Megan Matson has spent the last four years pretending Martin Sheen is president of the United States might make you think the Bolinas resident is one vote short of a majority. The truth, however, is that this Yale graduate and former advertising executive has all her marbles and then some. In the last four years, she has organized or participated in grassroots campaigns that reversed the status quo in state and federal legislatures. She is also founder of the MMOB -- Mainstreet Moms Opposed to Bush -- a grassroots campaign aimed at convincing the 22 million women who didn't vote in the 2000 election to register and vote in 2004. So far, the campaign's more than 200 volunteers have written letters to more than 30,000 unregistered progressive women voters in six swing states -- Florida, Missouri, Ohio, Nevada, Washington and South Carolina. "And we've still got four months to go," Matson says..... "I really began to think about mothers and how mothers have a tangible connection to the future because their children are going to be there. The Bush policies are so short term, I call them 'The Rapture' policies: You can't see them through unless you throw in The Rapture. "When you speak of children, all of your issues become very mainstream -- we all need clean air, clean water, we want that for ourselves and for our children, and we could speak to mothers about that.".... As of the first of July, more than 200 volunteers from 30 states have written more than 30,000 letters to unregistered women voters in Florida, Missouri, Ohio, Nevada, Washington and South Carolina. A volunteer in South Carolina combined her MMOB house party with a summer solstice party; at a party in Manassas, Va., 100 letters were mailed to Florida with specific information on numbers of uninsured, job losses, tax deficits and education shortfalls in the state. In Vermont, 12 volunteers wrote 60 letters in honor of their host's 60th birthday. Everything a volunteer needs to host a house party is on the MMOB's Web site -- registration forms for each of the swing states, phone numbers for volunteers and state offices, sample letters, party-planning tips and information on voting by absentee ballot, which MMOB is pushing hard as an alternative for working mothers. A volunteer in Georgia does all the formatting for PDFs; while Matson's longtime friend, Caroline Quine of Colorado, runs the Web site and 527 operations. Overhead has been almost nonexistent, so very little time has been spent on fund-raising. There's a shift to the positive under way at the MMOB now, with an added emphasis on the significance of every woman's vote in a tight election, and the development of a new fact sheet titled "Top Reasons For Moms To Love Senator John F. Kerry." Traditional "women's issues" such as reproductive choice and equal pay are recognized, but not singled out. "There's got to be another door open for women to dive into politics," Matson says. "If choice is not their door, we have to offer them other issues. For a lot of people, including women, choice is not their issue, but getting rid of Bush is. "Bush trumps all causes." |
IMPORTANT UPDATE ON THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT Dear Mike, Debate on the Federal Marriage Amendment in the U.S. Senate has begun. But I must share with you some information so that when the vote is taken, you will know exactly what it means. The FMA will probably not get the necessary two-thirds vote required for a constitutional amendment to pass. In fact, there is a possibility that it may not even get a simple majority. I urge you, DO NOT BE DISCOURAGED! This is only the beginning of a long fight for the very foundation of Western Civilization. One of the primary purposes of this vote is to make public the position of each Senator. There is a general feeling that some Senators will have to be voted out of office before the FMA can pass. And, despite all the rhetoric by some Senators as to why they voted against the FMA, the bottom line is this: A vote against the FMA is a vote for homosexual marriage. A vote for the FMA is a vote for traditional marriage. The Democratic leadership in the Senate has made a deal with the homosexual activists that they will kill the bill in return for homosexual financial support and votes. They are working hand in hand to do that. Their desire is to get a federal judge to strike all marriage laws from the books in all 50 states. The ACLU and other groups have already filed suits in several states to strike down marriage laws. Homosexual leaders have promised to �out� homosexual staff members of Senators who vote for the FMA. Please don�t think that we have lost if the FMA isn�t passed. This will be a long battle and the outcome will determine the kind of society our children and grandchildren will live in. I am greatly encouraged by the growing involvement of God-fearing people that I have seen in the last two weeks. I am hopeful that the �sleeping giant� is waking up. Mike, I am committed for the long haul. I hope that you are also. Too much is riding on the outcome. Here is what you can do right now: Take Action: -Pray -If you haven�t already signed the petition in support of the FMA, click here to do so. -Call your two Senators if you have not already done so. You can reach both Senators by calling 1-202-224-3121. For information on where your Senators stand, and for local office numbers and toll-free numbers, click here. We will be continually updating this information. -Please forward this email to your friends and urge them to get involved. After the vote, we will provide a list of those Senators who vote for homosexual marriage (against the FMA) and those who voted for traditional marriage (for the FMA). Mike, your continued involvement in this battle is very much needed! Please stay active and involved. Thank you and God bless you. Sincerely, Donald E. Wildmon, Founder and Chairman - American Family Association |
Researchers Accuse Bush of Manipulating Science By Elizabeth Shogren, Times Staff Writer WASHINGTON � More than 4,000 scientists, including 48 Nobel Prize winners and 127 members of the National Academy of Sciences, accused the Bush administration Thursday of distorting and suppressing science to suit its political goals. "Across a broad range of policy areas, the administration has undermined the quality and independence of the scientific advisory system and the morale of the government's outstanding scientific personnel," the scientists said in a letter. The administration has frequently been accused of misusing and ignoring science to further its policy aims. The list of signatures collected by the Union of Concerned Scientists suggests that the issue has become worrisome throughout the scientific community. Administration officials rejected the criticism Thursday, as they did when the same letter was released in February bearing the names of 62 prominent scientists. John Marburger, director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, said the letter and a report released simultaneously by the Union of Concerned Scientists "reach conclusions that are wrong and misleading." |
"This administration values and supports science, both as a vital necessity for national security and economic strength and as an indispensable source of guidance for national policy," Marburger said. |
"So while Michael Moore, Al Franken, George Soros, Crazy Al Gore and the rest of the characters from the climactic devil-worshipping scene in "Rosemary's Baby" provide the muscle for the Kerry campaign, Kerry picks a pretty-boy milquetoast as his running mate, narrowly edging out a puppy for the spot." ----Ann Coulter ![]() |
There may be a simple, overlooked, and incredibly basic reason why the fighting in Iraq refuses to end: Namely, there was never a surrender. Saddam Hussein's government never formally capitulated. Individual Iraqi leaders such as Tariq Aziz turned themselves over to United States forces, but the government itself signed no surrender or even any armistice. Top Iraqi officials either fled or went into hiding. They did not, officially, give up. Nor did Iraq's military officially give up. Some units capitulated to the U.S. or British forces besieging them. The Iraqi Army's 51st Division surrendered to British forces near Basra early in the fighting; commanders of the Iraq Army's Fifth Corps signed a cease-fire with U.S. commanders near Mosul in mid-April 2003. But other Iraqi units never formally gave in; soldiers simply left and returned home, either after Baghdad fell or when Iraq's army was ordered disbanded. More important, the Iraqi general staff never signed any overall surrender or truce. The lack of an admission of defeat may seem a formality, and has been treated as a formality by Washington and London. But the absence of a surrender--which, after all, means "we agree to stop fighting"--may be yet another in the succession of errors confounding the occupation of Iraq. The Pentagon and CIA quietly asked top Iraqi military leaders to surrender before the 2003 invasion, hoping Saddam could be toppled and combat made unnecessary. And while heavy combat was still ongoing in early April 2003, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said the United States would accept from Iraq only unconditional surrender, what Germany and Japan gave to conclude World War II. Once Iraq's cities had fallen, organized military resistance had ceased, and Saddam and other top leaders had stolen off, talk of surrender was tabled. Rumsfeld declared a formal surrender unworkable because Saddam's followers were "unlike traditional adversaries we have faced in past wars." The United States and United Kingdom "owned" Iraq, and that seemed to be all that mattered. It was not. First comes defeat, and then surrender; surrenders are essential to the cessation of war. You can't just beat your opponent: You must make your opponent say, "I am beaten." .... |
Voting official seeks process for canceling Election Day over terrorism - By: ERICA WERNER - Associated Press WASHINGTON -- The government needs to establish guidelines for canceling or rescheduling elections if terrorists strike the United States again, says the chairman of a new federal voting commission. Such guidelines do not currently exist, said DeForest B. Soaries, head of the voting panel. Soaries was appointed to the federal Election Assistance Commission last year by President Bush. Soaries said he wrote to National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge in April to raise the concerns. "I am still awaiting their response," he said. "Thus far we have not begun any meaningful discussion." Spokesmen for Rice and Ridge did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Soaries noted that Sept. 11, 2001, fell on Election Day in New York City -- and he said officials there had no rules to follow in making the decision to cancel the election and hold it later. Events in Spain, where a terrorist attack shortly before the March election possibly influenced its outcome, show the need for a process to deal with terrorists threatening or interrupting the Nov. 2 presidential election in America, he said. "Look at the possibilities. If the federal government were to cancel an election or suspend an election, it has tremendous political implications. If the federal government chose not to suspend an election it has political implications," said Soaries, a Republican and former secretary of state of New Jersey. "Who makes the call, under what circumstances is the call made, what are the constitutional implications?" he said. "I think we have to err on the side of transparency to protect the voting rights of the country." Soaries said his bipartisan, four-member commission might make a recommendation to Congress about setting up guidelies. "I'm hopeful that there are some proposals already being floated. If there are, we're not aware of them. If there are not, we will probably try to put one on the table," he said. Soaries also said he's met with a former New York state elections director to discuss how officials there handled the Sept. 11 attacks from the perspective of election administration. He said the commission is getting information from New York documenting the process used there. "The states control elections, but on the national scale where every state has its own election laws and its own election chief, who's in charge?" he said. Soaries also said he wants to know what federal officials are doing to increase security on Election Day. He said security officials must take care not to allow heightened security measures to intimidate minority voters, but that local and state election officials he's talked to have not been told what measures to expect. "There's got to be communication," he said, "between law enforcement and election officials in preparation for November." |
"We could take the city, but we would have to kill everyone in it." ----MOHAMMED ABDULLAH SHAHWANI, Iraq's director of national intelligence, on insurgents' strength in Falluja. |
"A final sidebar on the subject of corporate whoring: Am I the first to notice that Kerry�s addition of Edwards creates a perfect matchup this year? There�s two Johns on one ticket, and two pimps on the other." ----Thomas F. Schaller |
....The fact that Kerry was willing to choose someone who's a more charismatic speaker than himself and will inevitably take some of his spotlight away speaks well for him. Like they say, first rate people hire other first rate people. Second rate people hire third rate people. This was a first rate choice.... |