LEFT is RIGHT (blogging against The Bush-war)
### Iraq War Cost

      
Marriage is love.

Member: NRA Blacklist - PING



California Speaks Out!


Which One Has the Crisis ?!



Buy it Here for $12.95






Buy Blue




JOIN THE BUYCOTT
[Click the Image]


::::: MY PROFILE :::::

VIDEO:
When the Good Guys Do NOTHING
Welcome to the New World Order
Truth, War & Consequences
In the Name of Freedom
Oreo Calculator
Army of One
Remind Us
One Year
THANKS

ESSAY/SITE:
Bush's 40/IRAQ/SOTU/OTHER Lies
A Declaration of Progressive Principles
A Declaration of Impeachment
World's Leading Terrorist
Why Bush Invaded Iraq
Coalition Deaths in Iraq
Altruism is Out of Focus
Official Bush Lie Outlet
The Devil's Handbook
Third World Traveler
Paying for Wal-mart
Those Elusive WMDs
Ongoing Scandals
The Bush Record
Bush Scorecard
Who Served
Halliburton
AWOL
Evil

Voters Rights And More
Ringmaster = LEFT is RIGHT
[ Prev| Hub| Join| Random| Next]
Powered by Webring!

We Like the Moon!

EFF's Legal Guide for Bloggers


I reserve the right to publish your e-mail.

Enter your email address below to subscribe to Left is Right!


powered by Bloglet


Iraq for Sale - The War Profiteers
Front Pages / 10 x 10 / Open Secrets / VillageVoice / The New Standard / The Hill / Washington Note
Quotes to Ponder / CAP / Talking Points / POTD / Astronomy POTD / Botany POTD / Boondocks
Patriot Daily / TNR / PDA / DNC / Fact Check / States Writes / Real Clear Politics / Air America
Guardian / Reuters / Yahoo!News / GoogleNews / WatchingAmerica / LexisNexis News

"No matter how paranoid or conspiracy-minded you are, what the government is actually doing is worse than you imagine." - - -
William Blum

September 30, 2003

Photos of 9-28-03 A.N.S.W.E.R. March in Los Angeles, Taken by Left is Right

 






[Go to Top]   [HOME]

 

Mark Kleiman rocks and Guy Andrew Hall rolls!
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

 

LeftCoaster reminds us of the numerous calls by the ranking Republicans during the Clinton years for the Attorney General (Reno) to appoint an Independent Counsel (for Clinton/Gore's possible 1996 fundraising abuses), comparing it to today's calls by Democratic Congressmen for an I.C. to investigate the Plame/CIA coverup by Bush.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

My Son Is an Honor Student at Hillcrest Nazi High School

 

Proof that somehow the State of Texas got switched with the one on our alternate-universe-Earth.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

 

Bush helps colleges and universities collect more funds from students.

A survey by the National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges reports tuition hikes at state colleges and universities in at least 37 states -- almost all as a result of state budget cuts. Increases in in-state tuition range from 4.6 percent at the University of Illinois to nearly 40 percent for the schools in the University of California system.

The State University of New York, which includes 64 campuses throughout the Empire State, is typical. After the state legislature cut the budget 20 percent for the school system, SUNY raised annual tuition 28 percent -- from $3,400 to $4,350. "We did not do it lightly," said Shirley Strom Kenny, the president of Stony Brook University, a SUNY school. "But if we didn't raise tuition, we would have to limit what we offer to our students." The $950 increase has hit SUNY students hard: Most are from middle-class and working-class families. "We have been inundated by phone calls from parents and students, asking what are we going to do about this increase," said Jacqueline Pascariello, interim director of financial aid at Stony Brook.

The tuition hike means most students must take out more loans and add to their debt burden -- which for state college and university graduates nationwide already averages between $16,000 and $20,000.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Okay, Maybe My Parents Weren't That Bad

 

From CNN:

Toddler 'doing well' after nearly 3 weeks alone
Tuesday, September 30, 2003 Posted: 11:38 AM EDT (1538 GMT)
JACKSONVILLE, Florida (CNN) -- After spending nearly three weeks alone and surviving on raw pasta, mustard and ketchup, a 2-year-old Jacksonville, Florida, girl was in good spirits Tuesday morning at a hospital, officials told CNN.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Bush: "...extend the promise of prosperity to every forgotten corner of this country."

 

NDOL has actually a pretty good essay on Bush's failure to continue the reduction in poverty, which he promised in 2000, and has, instead, made things much worse for the lower economic class of this nation. Snippet:

In 2000, George W. Bush ran for president on a platform that claimed the Clinton administration had done too little to help less-fortunate Americans share in the national prosperity of the 1990s. In his acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention in Philadelphia, he said that Bill Clinton and Al Gore had "coasted through prosperity," and that he would "extend the promise of prosperity to every forgotten corner of this country."

Of all his broken promises, this was perhaps the cruelest. The prosperity he pledged to spread has vanished, and as always, a poor economy hurts poor people the most. But it gets worse: Bush also promised an aggressive agenda of "compassionate conservatism" to harness civil society to the task of addressing entrenched poverty and other social ills. This agenda has never really materialized, and the president seems to have lost interest in developing it. Instead, the administration has perversely and obsessively focused on improving the after-tax incomes of the wealthiest Americans, shifting the tax burden from those who earn income from inheritance and investment to those who earn income from work. Far from worrying about the plight of those in "every forgotten corner of this country," George W. Bush is deliberately engineering a more unequal society as his top domestic priority.

Well, yeah. Unless you've kept your head in the sand the past 2-1/2 years, this is not news. What would be news is if the Democratic candidates started mentioning it, because this is the type of simple message with which voters can identify.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Impact of Plame's Exposure by Bush's Staff

 

Josh Marshall hypothesizes the impact of the exposure of Valerie Plame on the safety of America. Snippet:

Plame's beat, if we can use that word, was weapons of mass destruction. And, of course, WMD is the big issue. It's why Iraq, why Joe Wilson, why Niger, why CIA referrals. That's what's at the bottom of all this stuff. Keeping WMD out of the wrong hands is, or was, Plame's job. If that's her job you can figure that over the years she's been involved in various operations aimed at tracking proliferation, worked with various human sources, all sorts of stuff like that.

Now Plame's name has been splashed across papers all over the world. And the folks that leaked her name made sure that they used her maiden name, Plame -- the one she did most of her work under -- rather than Wilson, the name which I'm told she now goes by. So now her name's out. You couldn't unlock everything just knowing her name -- covers are used and so forth. But once you know Plame is CIA, and what she looks like and so forth, you unravel most if not everything. And now every bad-actor and bad-acting government knows that anything that Plame was involved with, any operation, any company she was supposed to be working for, any people she worked closely with, are probably also CIA or at least work with CIA. WMD bad-guys now know to steer clear of them.

Let's say there's some operation Plame hasn't been involved with for a decade -- but it's still on-going. People will remember she used to be in on that operation and thus it's tagged as an Agency operation and it's useless. Everyone will know to steer clear. Now, I have no knowledge of any operations Plame was involved in or covers she used. These are hypotheticals. But it gives you a sense of the sort of work she was involved in and the potential collateral damage of exposing her cover. And consider what her work was: protecting Americans from weapons of mass destruction. Chew on that irony.


UPDATE: CalPundit has an excellent summary of this whole, sordid affair.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 29, 2003

ReviewOlogy is Back!

 

The witty, cantankerous REVIEWOLOGY is back, with fresh reviews of Once Upon a Time in Mexico along with Matchstick Men.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

 

Watch Paul Krugman's lecture at UC Berkeley on Friday, September 26, 2003 (approx 1 hour).
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Kucinich Owes Nothing

 

CNN.com has an interesting graph showing "how much money each of the 2004 presidential contenders owes to creditors, based on the latest Federal Election Commission figures." Kucinich is the only candidate (including Bush) who owes $0.00. Check out the other graphs, including total raised, total spent and total on-hand.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Bush is Just the Sacrificial Lamb

 

The Christian Ultra Right is not terribly concerned whether or not Bush is re-elected. They've used Bush as the front man the past three years shoving our nation to the right, increasing the Republican death-grip on industry and the economy, assuming control of elections through voting manipulation (electronic and other), and plunging us into an intractable quagmire in the Middle East. Even if Democrats somehow regain the White House, it will take many times the number of years Bush was in charge to reverse course and return to some semblance of the Clinton years, giving the Christian Ultra Right endless opportunities to regain control. Face it, only a revolution will work. The only question is, is Bush smart enough to understand how he's being used (and if so, does he even give a damn)?
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Question of the Month

 

Where are the grownups of the Republican Party?
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 28, 2003
 

"In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends."
--- Martin Luther King Jr.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 27, 2003

Florida Gets Bitch-Slapped

 

Josh Marshall has an incredible story about how Florida's state employee pension fund just bought out Edison Schools, a company that gets "contracts to run public schools on a for-profit basis and to do it better and more cheaply."

...
Things looked awfully bad until last week when Florida's state employee pension fund announced it was buying up all of Edison's stock and taking the company private --- for a cool $174 million. That's got to be the shrewdest investment the fund has made since it bought millions of shares of Enron just as the company entered its death spiral --- including 1.3 million shares just two weeks before the company declared bankruptcy.

As the St. Pete Times aptly noted yesterday, this gives "Florida the distinction of being essentially the sole owner of the nation's largest and perhaps most financially imperiled school management business."

The three member board of trustees of the fund is chaired by Florida Governor Jeb Bush, a big supporter of privatized schools and a big supporter of Edison.

So, you start a company to privatize education and take on the teachers unions. Your company fails miserably both in terms of the market and academic success. Then after you've hollowed the company out to cover your other bad debts friendly pols come along to bail you out with a couple hundred million from the teachers (and other public employees') pension fund. I love symmetry.

I feel sorry for the helpless Florida folks who have their hard-earned funds in the state pension, but, if Florida hasn't figured out by now that their government is corrupt ant that they need to look out for themselves until Democrats regain political power, then they deserve what they get. After all, they gave Bush to the rest of us, so screw 'em.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

White House Under Investigation? Yeah, Right...

 

The CIA has asked the Justice Department to "investigate allegations that the White House broke federal laws by revealing the identity of one of its undercover employees in retaliation against the woman’s husband, a former ambassador who publicly criticized President Bush’s since-discredited claim that Iraq had sought weapons-grade uranium from Africa, NBC News has learned":

NBC News’ Andrea Mitchell reported Friday night that the CIA has asked the Justice Department to investigate whether White House officials blew Plame’s [Wilson's wife] cover in retaliation against Wilson. Revealing the identities of covert officials is a violation of two laws, the National Agents’ Identity Act and the Unauthorized Release of Classified Information Act.

However, as CalPundit says:

Stay tuned. I have my doubts that this investigation will go anywhere — after all, as long as Novak doesn't squeal, the folks in the White House just have to deny everything and let the investigation die. And with Republicans in control of Congress, the special prosecutor act dead, and John Ashcroft running the Justice Department, investigatory zeal is likely to be somewhat below Ken Starrish proportions.

Still, you never know. The CIA must have come up with something or else they would have just dropped the whole thing.

Everyone who is naive enough to believe that Ashcroft is going to pusue this as required by his job description, please step forward and receive your lashings, because you are, well, naive.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 26, 2003

Friday Blahs

 

Mental exhaustion day today. Check out Media Whores Online, Daily Kos, Steve Gilliard, and Talking Points Memo for some really good late news and commentary. Just click "DAILY READINGS" in the Pages of Links on the sidebar. While you're over on the left (no pun intended) visit my photos from New Zealand that I snapped last month; what a beautiful country (and people!).
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

FRIDAY FUN

 

New Optical Illusions
Fartful (the meanings for names of Ikea furniture)
Smallville Home Page
Confusing Instructions
How to Cook an Alien
Find the Differences
Larry Carlson's Flash Movies
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 25, 2003

Put Out an APB on Scrooge McDuck Now!

 

Citizens for Tax Justice has released a soberingly grim report on the effect of Bush's tax cuts on the average family of four. The report is in PDF format. Highlights:

- The study calculates the net effects of Bush's tax cuts and massive borrowing over six years on a state-by-state basis.

- Current projections from the CBO show that Bush's policies are likely to add $3.8 trillion to the U.S. debt.

- Over the next six years each family will have an additional debt burden of over $52,000. After subtracting the 6-year tax savings from the tax cuts, the burden will still be nearly $38,000 per family.

- The burden to California will be $342.5 billion.

- After the first six years, the debt is expected to skyrocket by another $5.8 trillion between 2008 and 2013.

Oh my.

This is serious, folks.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Does This Mean That Store-Bought Is Better?

 

From Reuters:

Flame retardant found in breast milk
Last Updated: 2003-09-24 11:34:06 -0400 (Reuters Health)

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several American mothers nursing their infants had high levels of potentially toxic flame retardant chemicals in their breastmilk, a U.S. environmental group said on Tuesday.

While the study by the Environmental Working Group was small and did not show any health effects in the babies, the group said it showed just how widespread the chemicals are.

The chemicals are bromine-based fire retardants and are used in a wide range of products including furniture, computers, television sets, automobiles, copy machines and hair dryers to make them less likely to catch fire. They can build up in the body over years.

"Brominated fire retardants impair attention, learning, memory, and behavior in laboratory animals at surprisingly low levels," the EWG report reads.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

No WMD - Still

 

From the Guardian (intro):

The hunt for weapons of mass destruction yields - nothing
Intelligence claims of huge Iraqi stockpiles were wrong, says report
Julian Borger in Washington, Ewen MacAskill and Patrick Wintour
Thursday September 25, 2003
The Guardian

An intensive six-month search of Iraq for weapons of mass destruction has failed to discover a single trace of an illegal arsenal, according to accounts of a report circulating in Washington and London. The interim report, compiled by the CIA-led Iraq Survey Group (ISG) of 1,400 weapons experts and support staff, will instead focus on Saddam Hussein's capacity and intentions to build banned weapons.

A draft of the report has been sent to the White House, the Pentagon and Downing Street, a US intelligence source said. It has caused such disappointment that there is now a debate over whether it should be released to Congress over the next fortnight, as had been widely expected.

"It will mainly be an accounting of programmes and dual-use technologies," said one US intelligence source. "It demonstrates that the main judgments of the national intelligence estimate (NIE) in October 2002, that Saddam had hundreds of tonnes of chemical and biological agents ready, are false."

A BBC report yesterday said that the survey group, which includes British and Australian investigators, had come across no banned weapons, or delivery systems, or laboratories involved in developing such weapons.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Diebold Scandal

 

A SAIC report evaluating Diebold software (used in electronic voting machines) was released yesterday and it is a scathing evaluation. Read an evaluation of some of the more important conclusions HERE. Deibold says this about the report:

We are pleased to be moving forward," said Thomas W. Swidarski, president of Diebold Election Systems. "The thorough system assessment conducted by SAIC verifies that the Diebold voting station provides an unprecedented level of election security."

The report, on the other hand, notes this:

This Risk Assessment has identified several high-risk vulnerabilities in the implementation of the managerial, operational, and technical controls for AccuVote-TS voting system. If these vulnerabilities are exploited, significant impact could occur on the accuracy, integrity, and availability of election results. In addition, successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could also damage the reputation and interests of the SBE and the LBEs. This Risk Assessment also identified numerous vulnerabilities with a risk rating of medium and low that may have an impact upon AccuVote-TS voting if exploited.


Read the whole mess and draw your own conclusions. The web site, Blackboxvoting.com, was temporarily shut down yesterday when Diebold threatened the ISP hosting BBV. The site is back up and stronger than ever. Check it out.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

No-win Situation

 

The debate last night was a circus. Left is Right nearly turned it off several times when it appeared to be getting out of control, with 3 or more people speaking/shouting in unison. Arianna seems hell-bent on singling out Arnold on most every issue, which may not be the best strategy; it makes her appear petty and vindictive. She has a lot of great things to say otherwise, and these personal attacks on Arnold detract from the impetus of her ideas and policies. McClintock was definitely the most polished speaker; his points were clear and understandable; too bad he's a conservative. Cruz was very unimpressive and needs to show a hint of emotion when he speaks; his ideas are pretty good, but unless he shows some feeling towards his own concepts, many voters are not going to take him seriously. Camejo made points with his promise to reverse the trend of reducing taxes on the wealthy, but his appearance and demeanor were not polished enough for television. Arnold? What an underinformed, sexist dweeb.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

One Ringy Dingy, Two Ringy Dingies

 

The ultra-right media has been jumping all over Wesley Clark regarding a couple of phone calls he allegedly had, one from Canada and one to Rove. Spinsanity corrects the false impressions.

On a related note, Clark has apparently allowed his campaign to strike a blow at his online grassroots supporters, not a good way to kick off a presidential campaign. DailyKOS has the story.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 24, 2003

Shaking a stick at 50 million Americans

 

Court Rules Against Do-Not-Call Registry
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Brit Hume: Unfair and Unobjective

 

If you've got the stomach for it, HERE is the full text of President Bush's exclusive interview with Fox News' Brit Hume aired Monday night. Here is just one tiny snippet:

HUME: What is your theory about what Saddam Hussein did with his weapons of mass destruction?

BUSH: I think he hid them, I think he dispersed them. I think he is so adapted at deceiving the civilized world for a long period of time that it's going to take a while for the troops to unravel. But I firmly believe he had weapons of mass destruction. I know he used them at one time, and I'm confident he had programs that would enable him to have a weapon of mass destruction at his disposal.

HUME: What do you say to the notion -- you're beginning to hear it more and more now -- that actually he got rid of them but he didn't want his neighbors to know that, you see, because he wanted to be able to continue to intimidate them? What do you say to that?

BUSH: I think, like I said, be patient. The truth will be out. I told David Kay to go find the truth and to bring back reports based upon his own timetable that are solid reports about what he has found. We're analyzing miles and miles of documentation, we're interviewing all kinds of people in Iraq. Some of the famous cards in the deck of cards, and just average citizens who are bringing information. We've been there for about four months. And David is spending a great deal of time learning the truth. And the truth -- we'll find out the truth.

[Go to Top]   [HOME]

 

Left I sez:

Just a reminder to George Bush on the subject of prisons and torture - the U.S. is now holding thousands of people "extraterritorially" in at least three different countries (Iraq, Afghanistan, and Cuba) that we know of, in some cases torturing them, and in all cases outside any legal jurisdiction and subject to no laws other than the law of the jungle. Also just a simple observation on terrorism which Bush wants us to view as the #1 scourge of humanity: just in the lastest invasion of Iraq, the U.S. killed more innocent civilians than terrorists have in the entire history of the world (of course some might argue that the invasion of Iraq was a terrorist act).
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

 

Via the Left Coaster:

Howard Dean ramped up the rhetoric against Bush today, with his harshest language yet.

Dean's prepared text included some of the harshest language he has used against the administration. He charged that the Bush team has "capitalized on domestic fears of terrorism for political gain," given "handouts" to industries that are "causing irreparable harm to our environment" and "shackled our children and grandchildren" with record budget deficits to enact his "reckless tax cuts." Those tax cuts, he said, "are "bankrupting the states and starving Social Security, Medicare and our public schools" and have gone to "the largest political contributors at the expense of today's middle class."

That is how you go after Bush. Are the rest of you Dems taking notes?


Well, Senator Edward Kennedy is taking notes. Watch his speech in the Senate yesterday, as he rips apart Bush's foreign policy for Iraq. (Realplayer required.)
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

 


September 5, 2003

Dear Members of Congress:

My father's name is Staff Sgt. Charles Pollard with the 307th Military Police Reservist Company out of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He is a 22-year veteran and has been serving his country in Iraq for almost a year now. Ever since he went over there, I live in fear for his life. He writes to me every chance he gets and we try to send letters to him once or twice a week. I understand when he enlisted there would be a chance that he would have to go to war. He's done that and President Bush has called an end to the war in Iraq some months ago. When the tragedy of 9-11 happened I was scared, but I am more afraid now than ever. I am afraid that my dad will not come home on his own two feet but in a body bag. I'm afraid that he will not live to see me grow up, see me graduate from middle school, high school, and college and see my dreams and his hopes for me come to pass.

Allow me to tell you a little about our relationship. When I'm with my dad, he makes me laugh. We talk about what I want to be when I grow up. He gives me advise about boys and life. We talk about what we want to do and we spend a lot of time together just enjoying each other's company. He's a loving and caring father that is very attentive to my needs. What makes him unique to me is that, he is interested in every part of my life. I prayed that he would get a closer relationship with God and a few months before he was called to active duty he began to go to church more and got baptized. I was so proud of him. We need each other for strength and support as we learn the Word of God.

Since the beginning of the war President Bush has told the American people that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. He sent inspectors to investigate but they came up with nothing. President Bush stated that Iraq had links with terrorists like those who bombed the World Trade Center. But no proof has been found. President Bush had Americans afraid that we would have to protect ourselves from chemical warfare. My mom bought first aid kits and flashlights. She planned and drilled with us escapes routes and safe spots in our home. But, no chemical warfare. President Bush stated that Saddam Hussein lied about these weapons, but now that my dad, and other children's dads, moms, brothers, sisters, sons and daughters have died, were injured, and are over in Iraq, we find out that President Bush didn't tell the truth during his State of the Union Address and on other occasions as well. What this is telling me is that my dad may lose his life for a lie.

Many other children like myself, across our great nation, want their parents and family members home. When our forefathers developed this nation they stated that all people had a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I feel that my right to pursue happiness has been taken away from me, because having my dad in my life and with me brings me happiness. Please send our troops home to their families so they can be happy.

Sincerely, Robin Tamara Ponton, Age 13
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Powell in 2001: "[Saddam] has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction."

 

Kevin Drum has a conclusive opinion regarding the conflicting claims of WMD by Powell and Rice and the eventual failure to find any.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

6-month review

 

Andrea Buffa wonders if the anti-war movement was right. Snippet:

Six months after the attack on Iraq, no chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons have been found. The Iraqi army could not even defend its own capital, much less pose a threat to Western civilization. And it's looking more and more like the Bush Administration lied about or at least exaggerated the Iraqi threat to get support for the war. Isn't it about time for a public evaluation of the pre-emptive strike policy that has the U.S. invading countries that are alleged threats, and an investigation into whether the allegations about the Iraqi threat leading up to the war were really lies?

The Iraq war has made the world less safe from terrorism, not more safe. The other primary justification for the war was a purported link between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda. "Evidence from intelligence sources, secret communications and statements by people now in custody reveal that Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of Al Qaeda," President Bush said in his January 2003 State of the Union speech.

But intelligence experts and top Bush administration officials now acknowledge that no link was ever established between Al Qaeda and the Saddam Hussein regime. Just this week Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz admitted that his continued claims about an Iraq-Al Qaeda connection "should have been more precise." Even President Bush finally admitted on Wednesday there is no evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

The peace movement argued that war against Iraq was a bad way to fight terrorism ­ not only because of the nonexistent link between Iraq and Al Qaeda, but also because war would destabilize the world rather than making its people more safe. Unfortunately, this prediction seems to have become a reality. The United States angered and inflamed people all over the world by conducting a unilateral, unprovoked war against Iraq that killed thousands of innocent Iraqi people. And stability in the Middle East seems more precarious than ever as car bombings in Iraq and guerrilla attacks are making some experts argue that Iraq is literally becoming a terrorist haven before our very eyes.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

 

Recipient of the 2003 Ghandi Peace Award? None other than...

Dennis Kucinich

They shall beat their swords into plowshares;
And their spears into pruning hooks;
Nation shall not lift up sword against nation,
Neither shall they learn war any more.


(excerpted from "In Gandhi's Footsteps: The Gandhi Peace Awards" by James van Pelt, 1997-2002.)
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 23, 2003
 

Saw this when I unwrapped Sunday's paper. Almost puked my waffles.

[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Why Kucinich?

 

Great piece on Kucinich. Check it out. Snippets:

America is in a dangerous place right now. Economic and governmental power is divided among fewer and fewer entities. While in office, George Bush has consolidated these gains in ways unthinkable just three years ago. With the tragedies surrounding 9/11, he's solidified the conservative party line, and made it safe to fear again in America.

In my judgment, the antidote to this should be profound, radical change. Not necessarily in terms of policy--I'm not advocating Communism--but rather seizing back from conservatives the very definitions of politics. We need someone who advances a positive, hopeful agenda for Americans. Someone who will remind Americans of the enlightened values on which this country was founded, not the narrow, fearful, hate-fueled politics of the Republican party.

Dennis Kucinich is the only candidate with this vision. A great example is his view on terrorism. His solution? International cooperation and a policy position that begins with peace.

At the end of the day, most people are more impressed with a candidate's character than they are with his policies. When I first looked through the candidates, I was of course attracted to Kucinich's views. But it wasn't until I saw Dennis in Portland that I became really enthusiastic about him. He seems enormously credible to me. He's engaging and bright, but mostly, he seems authentic. That bit about peace comes from his website; it's not in the third person, and it wasn't written by a staffer--he wrote it.

[Go to Top]   [HOME]

3 Days in Jail

 

THIS will make your skin crawl...
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

 

Salon has a very good review on electronic voting fraud. (Unfortunately you need to be a subscriber to view the entire article.) Snippett:

[Bev] Harris has discovered that Diebold's voting software is so flawed that anyone with access to the system's computer can change the votes without leaving any record. On top of that, she's uncovered internal Diebold memos in which employees seem to suggest that the vulnerabilities are no big deal. The memos appear to be authentic -- Diebold even sent Harris a notice warning her that by posting the documents on the Web, she was infringing upon the company's intellectual property. Diebold did not return several calls for comment.

The problems Harris uncovered are not all that surprising; technologists have been warning of the potential for serious flaws in electronic voting systems -- especially touch-screen systems -- for years. In July, scientists at Johns Hopkins and Rice found that security in Diebold's voting software fell "far below even the most minimal security standards applicable in other contexts." The report prompted Maryland Gov. Robert Ehrlich to order a review of the Diebold systems used in his state. Many of the world's most highly regarded computer scientists have called on voting companies to build touch-screen systems that print a paper ballot -- a "paper trail" -- in order to reduce the risk of electronic tampering.

[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Gulf War service linked to Lou Gehrig's disease

 

From Reuters:

Gulf War service linked to Lou Gehrig's disease
Last Updated: 2003-09-23 10:57:07 -0400 (Reuters Health)
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - New research provides further evidence that military service in the 1991 Gulf War raised the risk of Lou Gehrig's disease or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). ALS is a degenerative nerve condition that results in paralysis and eventually death. At present, there is no cure for the disease. In the new study, the rate of ALS in Gulf War veterans younger than 45 years of age was more than twice the rate expected in the general population.

"ALS is extremely rare in young age groups," study author Dr. Robert W. Haley, from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, said in a statement. "Our findings suggest that some environmental exposure that these veterans had in the Gulf War greatly accelerated the ALS process so that it occurred at a much younger age."

The new findings are in agreement with a Veterans Affairs report that showed a nearly twofold increased risk of ALS among Gulf War veterans compared with other veterans. Although an elevated risk was seen among all military branches, Air Force and Army personnel appeared to be at the highest risk. However, not all evidence points to a link between Gulf War service and ALS. In 2000, researchers reported no excess hospitalization for ALS, lupus, or fibromyalgia among Gulf War veterans. In the current study, reported in the medical journal Neurology, Haley reviewed military registries to identify ALS cases that were diagnosed between 1991 and 1998. During the study period, 20 ALS cases were confirmed in about 690,000 Gulf War veterans. All but three of these cases were diagnosed before 45 years of age. So far, eleven of the patients have died. As the 8-year period progressed, the excess ALS cases among Gulf War veterans rose. By 1998, the rate of ALS among veterans was three times higher than that expected in the general population.

Still, not everyone is convinced that Gulf War service is a risk factor for ALS. "Although these researchers are to be congratulated for their thorough and painstaking work, there is still concern that this degree of excess risk is not convincing, especially given the small number of ALS cases and a number of potential (study design) flaws," Dr. Michael R. Rose, from King's College Hospital in London, notes in a related editorial. "The issue of ALS as a Gulf War-related illness will probably remain under scrutiny until the passage of time and accumulation of further evidence allows a firmer conclusion," he adds.

SOURCE: Neurology, September 23, 2003.

So add this to the growing list of casualties from the careless exposure of servicemen to depleted uranium and various chemicals during Gulf War I. Other than the recurring outbreaks of "mysterious" respiratory illnesses which have resulted in several deaths, it will take years to ascertain the effects of exposure on our current boys/girls in Iraq. Bush will be long gone by then.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Another Clark Eval

 

Here is a very favorable review of Clark by a former critic. Snippet:

He says he now wants to lead America out of the darkness, shorten what promises to be the longest and nastiest war in our history and restore our eroding prestige around the world. For sure, he’ll be strong on defense. But with his high moral standards and because he knows where and how the game’s played, there will probably be zero tolerance for either Pentagon porking or two-bit shenanigans.

No doubt he’s made his share of enemies. He doesn’t suffer fools easily and wouldn’t have allowed the dilettantes who convinced Dubya to do Iraq to even cut the White House lawn. So he should prepare for a fair amount of dart-throwing from detractors he’s ripped into during the past three decades.

Hey, I am one of those: I took a swing at Clark during the Kosovo campaign when I thought he screwed up the operation, and I called him a “Perfumed Prince.” Only years later did I discover from his book and other research that I was wrong – the blame should have been worn by British timidity and William Cohen, U.S. SecDef at the time.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

WHAAAAAA?

 

Issa, who started recall, now tells voters to reject it - Risk of GOP vote being split prompts call to retain Davis

[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 22, 2003

Arianna's Latest Game (Literally)

 

Arianna Huffington has been putting out some very corny online campaign video ads, like this latest one in game format. We wonder which segment of the voting public she is trying to attract, or if she is just flat out trying to have fun.

UPDATE: Arianna has a new video promoting her campaign reform initiative. Funny!
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

 

From Left i:

Congratulations Jon Stewart!

Two Emmys last night - one for "Best music, variety, or comedy series," and one for "Best writing for a music, variety, or comedy series." Well deserved awards indeed for someone whose idea of political humor does not need to involve the weight of Bill Clinton's girlfriends in order to get a laugh. Under the cover of humor, "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart" does some of the best political analysis and critique being done today, on a par with Tom Tomorrow's This Modern World but for 30 minutes, four days a week. What is happening in the world today is serious - innocent people killed, others out of work, homeless, and on and on. In the face of that, a good laugh every day is practically a requirement for sanity. If you haven't watched the Daily Show before (it's on the Comedy Central channel, so you need to have cable), do yourself a favor - do so immediately. If it's on too late for you (it's on at 11 pm here), do what I do - make use of the "record" function of your VCR and watch it over breakfast. But watch it.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

 

Picked up by TalkLeft (snippet):

Ashcroft Directs Prosecutors To File Most Serious Charges
Update: The Wall Street Journal is carrying this article about Ashcroft's new memo to federal prosecutors:

WASHINGTON -- Attorney General John Ashcroft, in a move that would further centralize prosecutorial power to Justice Department headquarters, is considering an order to U.S. attorneys to cut back significantly on plea bargaining with criminal defendants. The order, which could be issued as early as today, would require federal prosecutors to "charge and pursue the facts" of the cases they file, and notes that charges shouldn't be filed simply to exert leverage to induce a plea...

As TalkLeft explains:

Attorney General John Ashcroft is delivering a memo to every federal proseuctor tomorrow demanding that they file the most serious charges possible in every case, beginning immediately. "Most serious charges" are those bringing the heaviest sentence under the sentencing guidelines.

How do we stop this madness? Try not voting for Bush next year.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Where's George?

 

Eric Alterman, why are you the only one asking these questions?
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

 

Proof that there is no god.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Get Informed About Electronic Voting Fraud

 

Verifiedvoting.org is an excellent resource of all things electronic-voting. Left is Right recommends subscribing to their periodic Voter Verification Newsletter. Go HERE to register and choose "Please add me to the low-volume verifiedvoting.org email list" near the bottom.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

I.D. Theft - A Personal Story

 

As victims of identity theft, Left is Right and millions of others can understand the importance of this story. Snippet:

How to Steal $65 Billion - Why Identity Theft is a Growth Industry - By Robert X. Cringely

Recently my mail was stolen. It wasn't supposed to be stolen, which is a given, but it also wasn't supposed to be able to be stolen because I was out of town for two weeks and had the Post Office hold my mail. Only it turns out that in Santa Rosa, California at least, holding mail means different things to different mail carriers. Someone -- a substitute carrier I'm told -- saw that big old pile of mail down at the post office (the pile with the big "vacation hold" sign above it) and thought what the heck I'll just deliver that mail anyway. And so they did. That big old pile of mail sat in my big old mail box on my little old country road under a walnut tree and across from a pond and sometime in the next few days it was stolen. The only reason I know any of this is because a neighbor eventually found some of my mail and some of a lot of other people's mail strewn along the road like errant unmarked bills after a bank heist.

Here is something you probably didn't know. If you have the Post Office hold your mail and they do something stupid like NOT hold it for some reason, as happened to me, you have no recourse. They start an "investigation" of course, but since no investigator ever calls and certainly nobody reports back to me, the victim, I think this is pretty much of a ruse. They sure don't replace any of the mail.

Read the entire article HERE.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

141 Years Later, Still a Work in Progress

 


A Proclamation by the President of the United States
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

 


Citizen Lehew reminds us of this famous quote, never more appropriate than today:

"Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."

- Hermann Goering [Commander of the Luftwaffe, President of the Reichstag, Hitler's designated successor in the Third Reich] at the Nuremberg Trials
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 20, 2003

Clark Opens Up a Bit

 

Yesterday The Yin Blog presented a relatively detailed informal interview with Gen. Clark. The questions and Clark's responses are the best Left is Right has seen yet. Check it out.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Fanning the Flames

 

From Reuters: Syria Won't Bow to U.S. Pressure, Vows Iraq Support
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Electronic Voting Fraud: Time to Get Off Our Collective Butts?

 

Steve Gilliard is trying to shame us into stopping our complaining about electronic voting fraud and actually do something about it:

The voting machine thing

Occasionally, you'll read an ominous article on the new electronic voting machines. That the GOP will steal elections because the machines are not sound. I have a novel and unique idea, which doesn't involve handwringing. It's called activism. Simply put, you demand that the machines leave a paper trail. How do you do this? Well, we have this thing called a lawsuit. What you do is file and claim that the state must provide a verifiable, non-electronic printout of every vote. That this printout must also correlate to any signature or Id mark made by a voter.

See, you can sit on your hands, whine and claim that the nasty Bushies and their corporate masters will keep him in office, or you can whisper into the ears of the NAACP and other groups and demand there be external accountability for electronic machine voting. The voters rights act is a nice catchall.

If you think the other side may cheat, why in the hell would you sit around and wait until after the election for them to complain? Preemptive action is now the motto of the Bush Administration, let it be yours. Why in God's name, if you think the machines may be rigged, would you not do a meetup or something and file papers. Each state consititution is different and if there is fraud, you can bring it to heel. Personally, I think the elections they cite had reasons for the last minute swings, but if you genuinely believe these machines can be used for voter fraud, filing a legal action, with at least six months to go before a vote, might make sense.

Or you can join the tin of hat brigade and claim Bush will rig the election no matter what. You may not win, but you can raise a stink. Which is better than staring into space and plotting your emigration to Canada or Holland. Some of us like democracy in America and plan on keeping it. Thereis no law that says you have to be a vicitm. People sue and beat large corporations every day. Stop whining and start doing. Sometimes, that actually works.

So, one commentor at Steve's post decided to whine anyway:

That would be great except I dont have an in with the NAACP or any other group, and thier sure as hell not going to listen to me. Demand people listen to me, please. File a lawsuit, I'm not a lawyer, and I can't afford one. Yours solutions all require money and/or influence. All I can do is tell other people about this problem and inform the populace. This is something which Rebpublicans often call complaining or harping on the issue. Sure many people could do something about this issue, but most can't. Please, don't mistake getting the word out for education.
Chris Dub

Steve's response:

Chris Dub, You know, excuses are like assholes, everybody has one.

A: Ever hear of public interest law?
What you do is contact your local ACLU or NAACP Chapter and ask them about this. Believe me, if there's a case, they will be interested and it won't cost you a dime.

B: Meetups are free. You don't have to do this alone.

C: Your argument is, to be blunt, a crock of shit. You don't need influence to raise a stink. You just have to decide to act over complain. They won't listen to me is so fucking whiny. You have to make them listen to you. Which means calling people, writing letters, sending faxes, talking to reporters. In short, it means being a pain in the ass until someone listens. Now, they may choose to ignore you. But don't give me excuses for not trying. Because that's all they are, excuses. Oh, they're going to steal the election, but I can't do anything because I'm such a victim.. Jesus Christ, there are countries where they boil people alive for even ssying the word vote. The worst that happens is that you're ignored. But at least you tried. And that matters.
steve_gilliard

Is Steve G. correct? What do you think?
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 19, 2003

Class, Don't Forget Your Bookcovers

 

Believe it or not, it's back-to-school time in Iraq, too. Jason passes along this LA Times article which describes the starting-from-scratch conditions of the "Iraqi Unified School District" and the added burden of the U.S. trying to "add" their own revisionist history of Iraq to the textbooks. (One-time registration required. Go ahead, get it over with.)

Jason writes a follow-up to this article:

I sent this article to Left is Right because I couldn’t believe the stupidity and bias it contained. The main parts that bugged me were these:

“Saddam Hussein's exploitation of the Iraqi education system was impressive. He was embedded in the curriculum," said Leslye Arsht, a Texas education consultant advising the ministry.”

Why does Leslye seemed so shocked? Should we be shocked too? No duh he was embedded in their curriculum; he was the leader of the country for 30 years. Most political leaders are imbedded in their country’s history books. I’m sure GW has more than a few paragraphs written about him in Texas’ history books.

“Hussein's picture appeared in every textbook, and entire courses were devoted to his life.” Oh my, no!

Every US History book has a picture of Abraham Lincoln and George Washington in them, both of whom are responsible for starting wars. George Washington in particular is known for stockpiling weapons of destruction, and for committing acts of terrorism against the British. And yet his face appears on our currency, and we have a holiday celebrating him. The “Framers” also committed such atrocities and we still have college classes devoted to their lives and ideals.

“Initial activity has focused on weeding out the most objectionable elements — the ubiquitous praising of Saddam Hussein, statements of Iraqi superiority and the like.” If we did that to our text books there would be nothing left of them except maybe the cover.

“Distracted by the 1980-88 war with Iran — and the 1991 Persian Gulf War — Iraq stopped building and repairing schools in 1985, officials said.”

Nowhere in this paragraph or even in the article do they mention the sanctions placed on Iraq which, if not caused, then contributed to the shabby state of the schools.

Iraq could not import materials (and there aren’t a lot of trees in Iraq to build desks out of), and every time they tried to build a factory it was bombed by Israel or the US. Also not mentioned is that before the Gulf War Iraq had an 80% literacy rate. {http://www.michaelparenti.org/DefyingSanctions.html}
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

FRIDAY FUN (because we all deserve a break)

 

Too Funny for Words!
Four-word Film Reviews
Deadly Vacuum Cleaners (See Deathray Commercial; you'll need Quicktime)
Deadly Drills
Worst Jobs in Science (or anywhere, for that matter)
English-to-American Dictionary (esp. for our son, Will)
World's First Man-Cow (no, seriously!)
And finally, another Good Reason to Move to Canada

<<<<<<<< NOTE: Due to overwhelming demand by no one, Left is Right has archived all FRIDAY FUN posts in a separate links page. See sidebar for "Friday Fun Archives" >>>>>>>>>>
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Splendid Cinema

 

If you haven't seen American Splendor, you are missing the definitive movie of this year. Here's a review to whet your appetite.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Where's Arnold?

 

The Washington Post talks about the latest reaction of the top recall candidates to the repeated absence of Arnold from the debates:

The latest ambush came at a candidate debate here Wednesday that featured four prominent candidates sitting next to an empty chair that had been reserved for Schwarzenegger, who has shown no interest in attending any forum but one scheduled for next week in which he and his rivals will know the questions in advance.

After asking repeatedly, "Where's Arnold?" Lt. Gov. Cruz M. Bustamante, the only major Democrat on the recall ballot, proposed that all the leading candidates in the election skip next week's debate and instead try to embarrass Schwarzenegger by holding their own unscripted session outside of the site where the forum will be held.

The three other candidates on stage with Bustamante -- columnist and political independent Arianna Huffington, Republican state Sen. Tom McClintock and Green Party candidate Peter Camejo -- each expressed interest in the idea.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Clark Analysis

 

Daily KOS gives the first analysis, of Gen. Clark's candidacy, supported by Left is Right. Snippet:

But now Clark states that he did, in fact, back a war against Iraq. Clark, a retired army general, said his views on the war resemble those of Sens. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., and John Kerry, D-Mass., both of whom voted for the war but now question Bush's stewardship of the Iraqi occupation.

"That having been said, I was against the war as it emerged because there was no reason to start it when we did. We could have waited," Clark said during a 75-minute media session.

Waited for what? Either Iraq was an imminent threat, and Bush needed Congressional approval to wage war, or it wasn't. Sen. Graham knew the real score and voted against the resolution. So did a great deal other Democrats. I blame the deaths of every servicemember not just on Bush, but on every congressman and senator who enabled Bush to wage war. I'm surprised that in the current climate, with public opinion souring on the war, Clark would align himself with those under fire for supporting the war. Not to mention such statements are clearly at odds with what the Draft movement (myself included) were selling.

And there's also THIS critical analysis.

Kucinich is looking better every day.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Friday UN-Fun (because we definitely deserve a break from Bush)

 

On a much more sobering note, here is a Bushflash video about depleted uranium and its use in Yugoslavia and Iraq (twice). (It's about a 1 MB download, so broadband connection is probably best. Also, some scenes of deformed children, so first send the kids out to play.)

If you're still in the mood after the above, try figuring out the point of THIS video. (Warning: fast-moving and entertaining, and crank up the volume for full effect.)

Aw, heck, may as well add this video to the mix. It's probably the best one, anyway. And don't forget THIS one.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 18, 2003
 

Wow! The DLC must be on vacation, because some progressive liberal has apparently hijacked their web site and published an editorial in today's New Dem Daily that has balls! We mean, HERE is their usual product.

Also, be sure to check out a new progressive blog sponsored by the Rocky Mountain Progressive Network.

Finally, Max Cleland ROCKS.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Sorry For the Wound. Now Pay Your Bill.

 

One more reason to not get injured in Iraq.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Bush, the Action President

 

Thank god Bush invaded Iraq and destabilized the Middle East a lot more. Now Saudi Arabia is considering adding nuclear weapons to its arsenal. However, Kevin Drum hypothesizes that this is really an attempt by S.A. to force the U.N. to take a look at Isael's nuclear arsenal (finally).
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Captain George

 

Here's an interesting chart that shows the highest military rank achieved by all U.S. Presidents. Observation # 1: Only 1 general in the past century. Observation # 2: George W. Bush was a CAPTAIN??
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Ouch

 

Eric Alterman really, and we mean REALLY, takes it to Ralph Nader:

Speaking of people who need their (metaphorical) butts kicked, but good, Ralph Nader whines, “Old-timers years ago would have wondered what the Mayor means by marketing NYC. Cities were viewed more benignly when they were more livable, more employable at good wages, more replete with public institutions like good libraries, good public transit, good schools, good hospitals and clinics and good recreational facilities in the neighborhoods. New York City is crumbling on these measurements.”

Hey Ralph, no one, and I mean no one on the planet, is more responsible for the deterioration in the quality of life of my city than you are, bud. All you had to do was say, “I ran a great race and thanks for your support but this guy Bush is scary. Vote for Al, not me and we’ll we what we can get at the bargaining table….” But no, you wanted to elect Bush. And you did. Congrats.

All U.S. cities are struggling under the weight of the president’s malign neglect and the costs of his fiscal policies and needless war. And with all the damage you’ve caused the country, you’re worried about Snapple in New York schools. So shut up about my city, fella, and go get some help for that martyr complex of yours. You call yourself a progressive and yet you even tried to defeat Paul Wellstone. Sure, you’ll get your millionaire’s tax cut, but poor and working people in this city have enough burdens to bear without another hypocritical pro-Bush intervention this time around.

Get lost, Ralph. In fact, check with your buddy Dick Cheney. I hear he knows some really comfy out-of the-way, millionaire-only spots to get loose. And boy does that guy owe you a favor…
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Purple Will Never Be the Same

 

In tribute to Sheb Wooley, here are the instructions for building your own one-eyed, one-horned, flying, purple people-eater.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 17, 2003
 

I just received this personal letter from MoveOn:
Dear MoveOn member,
The US occupation in Iraq has left American soldiers unprepared and vulnerable, the country degenerating into chaos, and the Iraqi people embittered and hostile. Now the President is asking Congress for a staggering $87 billion blank check to fund more of the same. Until he takes strong steps to correct this failure, Congress shouldn't give him a cent. President Bush needs to fire the team responsible -- starting with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld -- and transfer authority to the United Nations. Please join us in telling Congress to hold on to our money until President Bush changes his team and changes his course in Iraq. You can send an email to your Member of Congress and sign our petition at:
http://www.moveon.org/firerumsfeld/
Okay, okay. It was a form letter by email. But still, this organization has done amazing things just in the past few months, such as the online primary and the petition to the Senate about the FCC rules. If you haven't already joined, you should give it serious consideration. Go check out MoveOn.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Bush Knew (Clinton Told Him Everything) But Didn't Act

 

Star Tribune editorial on Cheney's lies Sunday on MTP about 9-11. Snippet:
Because Clinton was to leave office in a few weeks, he decided against handing Bush a war in progress as he worked to put a new administration together.

Instead, Clarke briefed national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, Cheney and others. He emphasized that time was short and action was urgent. The Bush administration sat on the report for months and months. The first high-level discussion took place on Sept. 4, 2001, just a week before the attacks. The actions taken by the Bush administration following Sept. 11 closely parallel actions recommended in Clarke's nine-month-old plan. Who ignored the threat?

Cheney said that "we don't know" if there is a connection between Iraq and the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States. He's right only in the sense that "we don't know" if the sun will come up tomorrow. But all the evidence available says it will -- and that Iraq was not involved in Sept. 11.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Briefs

 

Blix is convinced that Iraq destroyed all of its WMD.

Rumsfeld denies tie between Hussein and 9-11.

The new DNC blog site really "Kicks Ass".

Skippy has some thoughtful discourse regarding the current disposition of the recall hold now being reviewed in the California courts. Most interesting is how the U.S. Supreme Court will rule if it reaches its desk.

"Democracy is a process by which the people are free to choose the man who will get the blame." --- Laurence J. Peter
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Will Your Vote Count?

 

Dan Gillmor suggests that the delay in the recall election gives California a chance to "get it right":
So, if the Appeals Court ruling delaying the California recall holds up, it'll likely ensure the installation of more modern voting machines throughout California. So far, so good.

But if the result is the use of touch-screen machines that have no verifiable audit trail -- a paper printout of the ballot so the voter can verify his or her choices -- then we'll have created a monster. Unfortunately, local and state voting officials have been almost totally tone-deaf to the danger, and many of the machines already installed are demonstrably open to doubt. (See the Verified Voting website, operated by Stanford University's David Dill, a computer scientist who has blown the whistle -- and is finally being heard to some degree - on this scandal.)

Nothing is more important to our trust in democracy than a verifiable ballot. Yet we're rushing headlong toward a system where we can't be sure that our votes are being counted at all. This is nuts. Let's use the delay, assuming it happens, to make these electronic machines believable. There's a lot at stake.
For good background reading on the subject of electronic voting, visit http://www.verifiedvoting.org/ This site is founded by David L. Dill, a Professor of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering at Stanford University. It's a good enough link to add to your permanent blogroll.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 16, 2003

The End May Be Near

 

If the Democrats do not win the 2004 election, the end of life as we know it will be close at hand. In just the past two years you've seen the rampant destruction of our lives and planet brought on by the Christian Right. It is becoming impossible to remember how secure life felt on the last day of Clinton's Administration. Each year the Christian Right remains in office throws us out one decade of progressive advancements. We are now reliving the 1970's with respect to freedom of the press, social programs, quality of health and education, and world order. Before Bush finishes his first stolen term we will be in the early 1960's.

We have nearly irreparably damaged federally funded social programs (Social Security, Medicare, education), environmental programs, States assistance, and a myriad of other government-supported programs by cutting taxes to the wealthiest, massively increasing military spending, and locking us into the costly repair of two (so far) countries (Iraq and Afghanistan. The economy is spiralling out of control. Homelessness and joblessness are dramatically increasing. Our children's education is getting worse yearly as we replace learning with testing. The cost of health care is increasing at a double-digit rate. Our environment (air, ozone, global warming, water) is suddenly and dramatically worsening. World chaos is rapidly escalating.

Our elected representatives no longer listen to us - they only respond to the wallets of business. The media has stopped being independent and instead is a sounding board of the government. Top elected government officials are no longer procesuted for stealing from, lying to and deceiving the public which it is paid to serve. The public no longer holds its elected officials accountable for their actions. And finally, the process by which officials are elected, the voting system, is being replaced by a new electronic system that is controlled by the political power in control, the Christian Right.

The damage cannot be repaired with another Clinton. This already requires a much larger fix. If it continues much past 2004, the fix will become unreachable in our (and our children's) lifetimes. The 2004 election is truly our last chance to save ourselves.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Krugman Explains Tax Cuts

 

Here it is. EVERYTHING you want to know about tax cuts but are afraid to ask. It's the whole enchilada. (registration required w/ NY Times - it's worth it)
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Victory!

 

Senate Votes to Block New FCC Rules! Now the House is under pressure to follow the Senate's lead.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Maybe 69% Was a Bit High, But Still...

 

From The Emerging Democratic Majority:
So Does the Public Really Think Saddam Was Behind 9/11?

Depends on how you ask the question. As reported in a recent Washington Post story, when asked whether it was likely Saddam "was personally involved in the September 11 terrorist attacks", 69 percent said it was very or somewhat likely.

But that figure’s pretty soft. A much better question fielded by the Program on International Policy Attitudes asked for the "best description of the relationship between the Iraqi government under Saddam Hussein and the terrorist group al-Qaeda". Here are the responses: 7 percent said there was no connection at all; 31 percent said a few al-Quada individuals visited Iraq or had contact with Iraqi officials; 35 percent said Iraq gave substantial support to al-Qaeda but was not involved in the 9/11 attacks; and just 21 percent endorsed the idea that Iraq was directly involved in carrying out the 9/11 attacks.

In other words, only about a fifth of Americans really seem to believe that Saddam was involved in 9/11. That level of belief is bad enough, Lord knows, since there’s zero evidence that he was, despite the pronouncements of the apparently completely mad Dick Cheney. But it’s better than 7 in 10.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Three Easy Pieces

 

Courtesy of Michael Moore, HERE are three facts you can use to convince your conservative friends or family members of the fallacy of Bush's rule over America.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 15, 2003

The Newest Bush Administration Lies

 

Step up and get your refill of lies from last week and weekend right here. Believe Left is Right, they are whoppers!
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Iraqi Guerrillas: Terrorists or Freedom Fighters?

 

HERE is a bone-chilling report by By Hannah Allam of Knight Ridder. She was given access to, and then interviewed, Iraqi guerrillas. "The interviews, conducted nine days apart in late August and early September, were the most extensive to date granted by the fighters who are killing Americans, and the visit to the camp was the first by journalists covering the war in Iraq." Reading this article, you should gain a deeper understanding of the determination of the Iraqis and the hopelessness facing the American troops.

(Note: Left is Right thanks Left i for the leads to the articles cited in this and the previous posts.)
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Wilson Decries Bush; "Alice in Wonderland" Re-emerges

 

Joseph Wilson of Niger uranium fame has written a scathing editorial in the San Jose Mercury News. It is an absolute-must-read. Snippet:
One way the administration stopped the debate [re: invasion of Iraq] was to oversell its intelligence. I know, because I was in the middle of the efforts to determine whether Iraq had attempted to purchase uranium "yellowcake'' -- a form of lightly processed ore -- from Africa.

At the request of the administration I traveled to the West African nation of Niger in February 2002 to check out the allegation. I reported that such a sale was highly unlikely, but my conclusions -- as well as the same conclusions from our ambassador on the scene and from a four-star Marine Corps general -- were ignored by the White House. Instead, the president relied upon an unsubstantiated reference in a British white paper to underpin his argument in the State of the Union address that Saddam was reconstituting his nuclear weapons programs. How many times did we hear the president, vice president and others speak of the looming threat of an Iraqi mushroom cloud?

Until several months ago, when it came out that the country was Niger, I assumed that the president had been referring to another African country. After I learned, belatedly to be sure, I came forward to insist that the administration correct the misstatements of fact. But the damage had already been done. The overblown rhetoric about nuclear weapons inspired fear and drowned out the many warnings that invasion would create its own formidable dangers.

Middle East experts warned over and over again that Iraq's many religious and ethnic factions could start battling each other in a bloody struggle for power. Former British foreign secretary Douglas Hurd fretted that we would unleash a terrorist-recruiting bonanza, and former U.S. national security adviser Brent Scowcroft warned of a security meltdown in the region. The U.S. army's top general at the time, Eric Shinseki, meanwhile, questioned the cakewalk scenario. He told Congress that we would need several hundred thousand soldiers in Iraq to put an end to the violence against our troops and against each other. His testimony was quickly repudiated by both Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz. As we now know, he was close to the mark. Our 130,000 soldiers are failing to stem the violence. Even as Rumsfeld says jauntily that all is going well, Secretary of State Colin Powell is running to the United Nations to try to get more foreign boots on the ground. One of the administration's staunchest supporters, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, says ominously that we risk strategic failure if we don't send reinforcements.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Recall: Delayed

 

Now that the California recall will be delayed, everyone can breathe a sigh of relief and restore some sanity to California politics. In the meantime, as the placement of electronic voting machines continues unabated across the land, we should start organizing a massive campaign to increase the interest and subsequent usage of absentee ballots, which apparently will be the only hedge available to counter the "fixing" of election results through electronic voting.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Free Lies!

 

MoveOn is sponsoring a daily e-mail for you that will discuss Bush's misstatements. Give it a try!
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

1.5 Days of Occupation vs. Defeating AIDS: Which Would Jesus Choose?

 

HERE is yet more advice on how the $87 Billion demanded by Bush for Halliraqburton could be better spent. Snippet:
This year Bush asked for only $200 million for the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB, and Malaria, a sum equal to 1.5 days of spending on the US occupying forces in Iraq. The US annual contributions to fight malaria are less than the costs of one day's occupation, and as a result, 3 million Africans will die needlessly from that preventable and treatable disease.

But who is talking about $87 billion for the 30 million Africans dying from the effects of HIV/AIDS, or the children dying of malaria, or the 15 million AIDS orphans, or the dispossessed of Liberia and Sierra Leone, or the impoverished children of America without medical insurance? True security in the world will not be bought by US hegemony. The world will not tolerate unilateral control by a country that accounts for less than 5 percent of humanity. The United States will continue to destabilize Iraq as long as the occupation continues, and the American people will end up paying a high price for the fantasy of hegemony.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 14, 2003

Cheney Lies on the Sabbath

 

Left is Right feels obligated to point the reader to this. Here is the transcript from today's Meet the Press interview with V.P. Dick Cheney. This is quite a sobering read. Just one snippet:
MR. RUSSERT: The Washington Post asked the American people about Saddam Hussein, and this is what they said: 69 percent said he was involved in the September 11 attacks. Are you surprised by that?
VICE PRES. CHENEY: No. I think it’s not surprising that people make that connection.
MR. RUSSERT: But is there a connection?
VICE PRES. CHENEY: We don’t know. You and I talked about this two years ago. I can remember you asking me this question just a few days after the original attack. At the time I said no, we didn’t have any evidence of that.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

 

"Whenever you find that you are on the side of the majority, it is time to reform." --- Mark Twain

"Never let your sense of morals get in the way of doing what's right." --- Isaac Asimov

"Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you’re a mile away and you have their shoes."
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 13, 2003

Sunday Morning Fun

 

Bored this Sunday morning? Build your own H-bomb!
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 12, 2003

Are We Turning the Corner, or Not?

 

So, what's really happening? The media are starting to emerge from their devilsfood-cakes-covered-with-Republican-icing cocoons, apparently realizing they may not be able to have their cake and eat it too. The Republicans are having second thoughts about holding the 2004 convention in NYC, now that the city is waking up to the fact that they have been screwed not once (9-11) not twice (failed promises of federal disaster bailout funding) but repeatedly (EPA lies, Iraq lies, deficit lies, clean air lies, state aid lies, education support lies, economic recovery lies...) Bush's polling numbers are falling like drunks at Mardi Gras. Terrorism in Iraq, non-existent before March 20, 2003, is rapidly escalating into an uncontrolled disaster for American (and other, suckered coalition) troops. Bush is running to the U.N. with his tail between his legs. Moderate Republicans in the Senate are starting to reclaim minds of their own. The Daily Show is getting bolder by the week. One liberal book after another are finding homes on the best-seller list.

And yet....

And yet....

The Congress just promised Bush every penny of his $87 Billion request for funding Halliburton (oops, sorry...IRAQ) for another few months. Bush continues his non-stop Tour of Lies across the nation with nary a whimper from the once-bold anti-war demonstrating masses. The CEO vs. average worker salary differential in most corporations continues to grow. Cities and states continue the transformation from paper to electronic ballots despite mounting evidence of potentially rampant voting fraud and manipulation by the Republican-owned vendors of electronic voting machines. Bush, who in his campaign speeches promised only continued federal surpluses, no matter what, is spearheading the most mind-numbing federal deficits no one would have dared to predict. Ever. Not a single senior Administration official has been brought to task for any of the incessant eruption of lies and deceit generated since day one.

And the winner is: Almost 70 percent of Americans STILL believe IRAQ was responsible for 9-11. That pretty much bottles up any hope of turning the corner any time soon.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

A Father's Apology

 

A Letter To My Children: A father's apology to his children for his complacency about caring for their future, and his new resolve to do everything in his power to return things to their former state.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Growth Hormone Therapy: Pros and Cons

 

Is Shortness a Disease? (38 minute interview on KPCC from earlier this week - you'll need Realplayer; note: we recommend Realplayer 8 rather than Real One)
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

We Must Not Forget (no, not 9-11)

 

As we approach "The Announcement" by Wesley Clark, let's not forget the one candidate who, more than any of the others (except maybe for Al Sharpton) is the only one who talks the talk AND walks the walk:
DENNIS KUCINICH
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Halliraqburton: Our Planet's Newest Nation

 

Skippy has pointed us to this very moving letter by army veteran Skot Pierson who contradicts views that "we are not a nation of greed and invaders". To point:
As for why we are in Iraq, the following is still public record in spite of the Bush administration's attempts to conceal these facts:

The Washington Post reported that Halliburton, the company formerly headed by Vice President Cheney, has won contracts worth billions of dollars out of Operation Iraqi Freedom from no-bid contracts BushCo awarded it. Here is a partial breakdown:

Fully one-third of the $3.9 billion per month cost of keeping U.S. troops in Iraq is going directly to Halliburton.
$1 billion has been paid Halliburton through mid-August alone, plus ...
$705 million for an initial round of oil field work.
$142 million for base camp operations in Kuwait.
$170 million for logistical support for Iraqi reconstruction.
$28 million for construction of POW camps.
$39 million for base camps in Jordan.
$183 million for Afghanistan.
A staggering $300 million jumbo contract for the Navy, and (brace yourself) ...
An eye-popping $7 billion to put out non-existent fires at Iraqi oil wells.
The sheer size of Halliburton's incredible windfall from BushCo is breathtaking - and, there's no end in sight!
Do the math: Can there be any doubt why we are in Iraq?
Read the entire letter HERE.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

FRIDAY FUN

 

Arnold Does Ads (and check out all the other celebrities' ads too)
Funny Cat Scenes
Behind the Name (meanings of first names)
Amiright (making fun of song lyrics)
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Bush Has Done His Thing... What About You?

 

Mark Morford asks, how are you reacting to 9-11? Snippet:
This is the only decision that really matters, the only choice that has any true power. Will 9/11 and every subsequent emotionally explosive event in your life result in bitter conflict and finger-pointing and bile, or self-discovery and personal opinion and raw compassion? It's that simple. And that difficult.

Choose the former, you are a proud lockstep American, accepted and nicely conformist and a happy member of the Bush-approved herd, ready to shop hard and suck down that paltry tax refund and defend the nation against those gul-dang liberals and gays and America-haters.

Choose the latter, and you are quickly outcast, shunned, radiating all by yourself, dancing to your own inner samba, smiling like a demon, godless heathen pagan progressive intellectual traitorous blasphemous slut that you are, as the establishment just scowls and adds you to its blacklist.

Because it all comes down to one vital question, really. All the pain, all the forced patriotism, the commemorative plates, the media blitzing and force-fed jingoism and BushCo viciously leveraging 9/11 for political and corporate gain, and you merely left hanging by bare emotional and spiritual threads, raw and naked and wondering just what the hell is happening to the world, and where did this handbasket come from?

[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 11, 2003

What's Your 9-11 IQ?

 

Take the 9-11 quiz. You'll be surprised.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Krugman's Sobering News About Our Financial Future

 

Economist Paul Krugman was interviewed by Terri Gross on NPR's Fresh Air yesterday. Paul gives predictions on the direction of our economy that will scare your pants off. Listen HERE. Basically, if you're looking forward to having Social Security comfort your retirement years, then it's time to wake up and smell the financial stink coming from the White House. Bush & Co. are in the process of backrupting not only Social Security, but all of the social programs built up over the decades by federal legislation. Oh, and start putting those pennies away now... you'll need every single one of them.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Bush Runs Out of Henchmen, Hires EPA

 

In Honor of 9-11 and all the Bush Administration did for the residents/visitors of New York City, Left is Right gives to you, the reader, the latest chapter of "9-11: The Bush Conspiracy":
Study finds WTC fires spewed toxic gases for weeks
Last Updated: 2003-09-10 15:04:05 -0400 (Reuters Health) By Ellen Wulfhorst

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The burning ruins of the World Trade Center spewed toxic gases "like a chemical factory" for at least six weeks after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks despite government assurances the air was safe, according to a study released on Wednesday. The gases of toxic metals, acids and organics could penetrate deeply into the lungs of workers at Ground Zero, said the study by scientists at the University of California at Davis and released at a meeting of the American Chemical Society in New York.

Lead study author Thomas Cahill, a professor of physics and engineering, said conditions would have been "brutal" for workers at Ground Zero without respirators and slightly less so for those working or living in adjacent buildings. "The debris pile acted like a chemical factory," Cahill said. "It cooked together the components and the buildings and their contents, including enormous numbers of computers, and gave off gases of toxic metals, acids and organics for at least six weeks." The report comes amid questions about air quality at Ground Zero and what the public was told by the government.

Last month, an internal report by Environmental Protection Agency Inspector General Nikki Tinsley said the White House pressured the agency to make premature statements that the air was safe to breathe. The EPA issued an air quality statement on Sept. 18, 2001, even though it "did not have sufficient data and analyzes to make the statement," the report said. The White House "convinced the EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones," Tinsley said. Among the information withheld was the potential health hazard of breathing asbestos, lead, concrete and pulverized glass, the report said.

New York leaders including Sen. Hillary Clinton have called on the Justice Department to investigate. EPA acting administrator Marianne Horinko has defended the agency, saying it used the best information it had available. According to the newly released UC-Davis study, after the towers collapsed, tons of concrete, glass, furniture, carpets, insulation, computers and papers burned until Dec. 19, 2001. Some elements of the debris combined with organic matter and chlorine from papers and plastics and escaped to the surface as metal-rich gases that either burned or chemically decomposed into very fine particles that could easily penetrate deep into human lungs, it said. Specifically, the study said samples from Ground Zero found four types of particles listed by the EPA as likely to harm human health -- fine metals that can damage lungs, sulfuric acid that attacks lung cells, fine insoluble particles of glass that can travel through the lungs to the bloodstream and heart, and high-temperature carcinogenic organic matter.

Measurements made at Ground Zero in May 2002, months after the fires were out, showed levels of nearly all the fine components had declined more than 90 percent, the study said.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

BUSH RESIGNS

 

Today George W. Bush resigned from office. Greg Palast has a complete copy of the resignation speech HERE.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 10, 2003
 

6 Misconceptions about 9-11.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Palast Ties Everything Together

 

If You haven't heard or read Greg Palast's speech of 8/22/03, you can read it HERE. It'll take 30 minutes of your time (okay, 300 if you're Schwarzenegger), but it's time well-spent.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Celebrate! Celebrate! Dance to the Music!

 

Daily Kos puts today's death of an American soldier into the proper Republican perspective:
But whatever, the bombing is another wonderful victory for the US "War on Terror" according to Bush. You see, every time US forces are killed in Iraq we should celebrate, because those very same terrorists would otherwise be killing Americans here in the US.

See? Killing Americans in Iraq is good. Killing Americans in the US is bad. Glad we got that cleared up.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Recall God

 

Mark Morford takes the "Recall" fad one step further. Snippet:
Here is what you do: You ride the recall wave. Hop the glorious supercharged recall bandwagon. Only you do not stop with pallid politicos and desperate governor wanna-bes and Indian casinos and water rights and energy woes and talk of just what the hell to do with all those icky homeless and retired and mentally ill and newborn poor people.

You start with, say, beer commercials. Yes. Cast your vote now. Let us recall dumb frat guys toasting Michelob Lights and ogling anorexic frigid beer babes in loud bars. Let us recall beer-bellied lug nuts who wear grungy sweatshirts and baseball hats and last 1.7 minutes in bed before passing out and dreaming of, well, their next beer. Is that a good place to start?

But don't stop there. Let us, furthermore, recall hugely overweight football-jerseyed lumps hawking giant Round Table pizzas and sniffing the slices as if they were a fine wine, before jamming another hunk down their throats and clogging their arteries and saying good-bye to the notion of ever seeing their toes again. Recall the toxic garbage-food obesity epidemic.

Recall the idea that if your ass isn't making a permanent indentation in your $149 Ikea couch every Sunday for six hours straight during NFL season, you are somehow betraying the very notion of manliness and testosterone. This is your choice. You are the only voter that matters. Do you sense your power now?

Recall the toxic beauty myth. Recall Glamour and Cosmo and Modern Bride and the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition and every other mag that Photoshops the living hell out of Giselle's overpampered ass and makes you somehow believe true divinity lies in having just the right $400 Gucci purse and $500 Botoxed forehead and 10 Tips to Force Him to Marry Your Desperate Needy Self.
That's just the tip of Mark's iceberg.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

The Self-Parking Prius

 

Toyota is releasing the new, 2004 Prius next month. It's bigger, more powerful, and more fuel efficient. I guess Left is Right coulda waited a year instead of buying the 2002 model, but to tell you the truth, it's been an extremely satisfying car.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 9, 2003
 

Here is the first part of Bush's speech. Only those sections that are lies are emboldened.
Good evening. I have asked for this time to keep you informed of America's actions in the war on terror. Nearly two years ago, following deadly attacks on our country, we began a systematic campaign against terrorism. These months have been a time of new responsibilities, and sacrifice, and national resolve, and great progress.

America and a broad coalition acted first in Afghanistan, by destroying the training camps of terror, and removing the regime that harbored al Qaeda. In a series of raids and actions around the world, nearly two-thirds of al Qaeda's known leaders have been captured or killed, and we continue on al Qaeda's trail. We have exposed terrorist front groups, seized terrorist accounts, taken new measures to protect our homeland, and uncovered sleeper cells inside the United States. And we acted in Iraq, where the former regime sponsored terror, possessed and used weapons of mass destruction, and for 12 years defied the clear demands of the United Nations Security Council. Our coalition enforced these international demands in one of the swiftest and most humane military campaigns in history.

For a generation leading up to September 11, 2001, terrorists and their radical allies attacked innocent people in the Middle East and beyond, without facing a sustained and serious response. The terrorists became convinced that free nations were decadent and weak. And they grew bolder, believing that history was on their side. Since America put out the fires of September 11, and mourned our dead, and went to war, history has taken a different turn. We have carried the fight to the enemy. We are rolling back the terrorist threat to civilization, not on the fringes of its influence, but at the heart of its power.

This work continues. In Iraq, we are helping the longsuffering people of that country to build a decent and democratic society at the center of the Middle East. Together we are transforming a place of torture chambers and mass graves into a nation of laws and free institutions. This undertaking is difficult and costly - yet worthy of our country, and critical to our security.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

So, Mr. Bush, How Successful Have You Been the Past 24 Months?

 

Rob over at Conniptions reviews our War on Terror:
How are we doing?

Osama bin Laden - alive and free
Saddam Hussein - alive and free
Al Qaeda - thriving
Mulluh Omar - alive and free
Taliban - re-emerging
WMD - nope
Jose Padilla - American citizen, still being held as "enemy combatant," incommunicado and without charge
287 US troops killed in Iraq
1,450 US troops wounded in Iraq
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Bush Popularity Continues Freefall

 

As Wolf Blitzer so aptly points out today:
Mr. Bush's poll numbers are already declining. The latest CNN-Time poll shows his approval rating at 52 percent as of last week, down from 63 percent in May, right after he declared an end to major combat operations in Iraq.

And contrast that to 89 percent two years ago -- at an extraordinary moment right after September 11, 2001.

Compare that to his predecessor's most difficult political gauntlet. September 1998 was the height of the impeachment scandal. Bill Clinton's approval rating was 63 percent. In December 1998, the House of Representatives voted to impeach Mr. Clinton. His approval rating climbed to 67 percent.

Now, in the midst of a re-election campaign, a president counts on stabilization in Iraq, a reduced terrorist threat and patience from voters.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

 

"You can't say that civilization don't advance, however, for in every war they kill you in a new way."
-- Will Rogers
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Vacation Photos

 

Finally posted: Some photos of Left is Right's vacation in New Zealand during August, 2003.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 8, 2003

Ashcroft: Can't defeat the Dead, So He picks on the Living

 

"When I think of John Ashcroft I just keep remembering that, as an incumbent senator, he lost an election to a dead candidate." -- Left is Right
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

What Would $87 Billion Buy?

 

In Bush's speech last night he asked for $87 Billion to continue the occupation of Iraq. The Capital TImes tells us what $87 Billion could buy instead (snippets):
Bush told the nation he would spend whatever it takes to maintain these military adventures abroad, even as rising death tolls, bombings and threats raise doubts about whether they are making America more secure. The United States already has a military budget that costs this country roughly $400 billion annually, but Bush wants U.S. taxpayers to spend more on his war games.

The $87 billion figure is far greater than Bush let on before Iraq was attacked last spring, yet it is undoubtedly another deception. Serious military analysts suggest that the true cost of the war will be much more.

Even if the United States were to turn over responsibility for stabilizing Iraq to the United Nations - as it should - there would still be costs. But those costs could be covered within current military and international development budgets.

What the president did not mention in his speech is that the $87 billion more he seeks to fund his occupations abroad could pay for 1.4 million new teachers at home. It could help 11 million low-income families meet housing needs. It could provide health care coverage for 30 million children.

For Wisconsinites and residents of other states that are struggling to maintain state and local services in the face of economic doldrums, the $87 billion would balance every state budget.

Overseas, the United States should begin to address the conditions that create the frustration and resentments that lead to terrorism. The president's $87 billion could, according to UNICEF, meet the basic human needs of every impoverished person on Earth.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Stupid People Stay Stupid

 

Some things apparently never change:
Hussein Link to 9/11 Lingers in Many Minds
By Dana Milbank and Claudia Deane - Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, September 6, 2003; Page A01

Nearing the second anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, seven in 10 Americans continue to believe that Iraq's Saddam Hussein had a role in the attacks, even though the Bush administration and congressional investigators say they have no evidence of this.

Sixty-nine percent of Americans said they thought it at least likely that Hussein was involved in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, according to the latest Washington Post poll. That impression, which exists despite the fact that the hijackers were mostly Saudi nationals acting for al Qaeda, is broadly shared by Democrats, Republicans and independents.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

O'Reilly Apologizes... NOT

 

Lifted from Altercation:
Quote of the Day: “If the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it’s clean, he has nothing, I will apologize to the nation and I will not trust the Bush administration again.” Bill O’Reilly on GMA, March 18, 2003, as quoted by Utne Reader, Septmber 2003, p.16
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

More 9-11 Victims

 

Health Problems Plague WTC Rescuers:
WASHINGTON 9.8.03, 8:57a -- A federal program created to monitor the health effects of work at the World Trade Center site in New York has found thousands still suffering from asthma, pneumonia, bronchitis and depression.
It's the first time the health of rescue and recovery workers has been followed so closely after a major disaster. As the second anniversary of the attacks nears, new information coming out on long-term health implications of rescue work is getting the attention of emergency officials and prompting Congress to consider creating federal screening for future disasters.

To date, about 7,500 of the estimated 30,000 workers who toiled at the ruins have been examined under the $12 million program created in July 2002. With $4 million in extra funding this year, doctors expect to examine 4,500 more by March 2004.

Preliminary results show 48 percent of workers with ear, nose and throat problems such as nasal congestion, hoarseness, headaches and throat irritation. Thirty percent have pulmonary problems, including shortness of breath, persistent cough and wheezing. About 19 percent of workers have been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder _ at least double the rate seen in the general population.

The data reflect 1,100 patients screened between July 2002 and April 2003. But program directors say patients have continued to report symptoms at about the same rate since then.
So, now we must wonder how many of these hapless victims could have been saved from disease and possibly death if the White House had not forced the EPA to revise the air quality report following 9-11. Is there anything, and I mean ANYTHING, upon which the Bush Administration has acted, that has NOT been screwed? I challenge you, the reader to go to the comments and name one thing.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Finally, Someone Speaks Up!

 

Meacher allegations over September 11 'monstrous', says US. Snippet:
By Francis Elliott, Deputy Political Editor, Telegraph News (Filed: 07/09/2003)

Michael Meacher, one of Tony Blair's longest serving ministers until earlier this year, sparked outrage yesterday by suggesting that the United States government deliberately allowed the terrorist attacks of September 11 to take place. Mr Meacher said the attacks, in which at least 3,000 people died, provided a convenient pretext for wars on Afghanistan and Iraq in which the real purpose was to secure oil supplies for America.

The former environment minister, who until three months ago shared responsibility for Britain's nuclear power plants, made the extraordinary claims in a newspaper article. Mr Meacher listed a number of reports detailing intelligence that the US was said to have which warned of the September 11 attacks. He questioned why military jets were not sent to intercept the hijacked passenger aircraft on the morning of the outrage two years ago. "Was this inaction simply the result of key people disregarding, or being ignorant of, the evidence? Or could US air security operations have been deliberately stood down on September 11? If so, why and on whose authority?" Mr Meacher wrote in The Guardian yesterday.

The MP for Oldham cited a document called Rebuilding America's Defences, written in September 2000 by a neo-conservative think tank, Project for the New American Century, which was set up by a group that included Dick Cheney, the American vice president, Donald Rumsfeld, the defence secretary, and Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy defence secretary, which he called "a blueprint for US world domination". He said the document stated that making America "tomorrow's dominant force" would be a long process without "some catalysing event - like a new Pearl Harbour".
Is it really that horrible for one to think that Bush & Co. allowed 9-11? If Meacher's allegations are true, it is consistent with the behavior of the Bush Administration since Inauguration Day, 2001. There is more than enough evidence to support the SUSPICION that it is true. Left is Right just takes the next step and agrees that it IS true.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

QUOTE OF THE MONTH

 

From Bush's 9/7/03 speech to the nation:
"From the outset, I have expressed confidence in the ability of the Iraqi people to govern themselves. Now they must rise to the responsibilities of a free people, and secure the blessings of their own liberty."
Translated into English:
"I set unreasonable standards for the Iraqi people, and now that I have systematically destroyed their resources by my unprovoked invasion and oppressive occupation, I expect them to become just like us."
And HERE's a summary of the speech.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 7, 2003

How Bad is Bad?

 

I guess what Left is Right finds fascinating is not that Bush's approval rating (percent that rated his job performance good or excellent) has dropped to 45%, but that 45% of America believes that he is doing a good to excellent job. Just how low are these peoples' standards? Exactly how much worse a job can Bush do before these people start thinking that his job performance is not up to par?
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 5, 2003

Getting Ready for Election Fraud 101A

 

Diebold/Populex: An election catastrophe in the waiting.
“Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.” --Russian Dictator Joseph Stalin
This is serious, folks. Next to Iraq and all the associated scandals, electronic voting is the next step in the relentless takeover of our republic by the wealthy Right. Don't believe Left is Right? Then keep an eye on those exit polls (if you can still find any out there in the next election); they're rapidly disappearing since they are increasingly no longer able to predict winners (well, they predict who should be the winners, but they won't match the electronic tallies.)
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

FRIDAY FUN

 

SITES TO VISIT:

Palms Springs Golf Cart Parade
Biodiversity at Home
Find Out Where Your Fat Is with New Scanner
Yesterland (Former Disneyland Attractions)
South Korea to Improve Viagra (and check out the section headings)
Weird Movies
How about a jacket with 42 pockets.
Playing Dead.

GAMES:

Mata Nui
Ping Pong Cannon
Bug Bomber
Air Hockey
Exploding Cows
Office Space
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

J. L. Redux

 

Jessica Lynch, American Stooge. But soon a very rich one.

In case your anti-war focus has dimmed, be sure to re-read THIS.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 4, 2003

Apology

 

Left is Right apologizes for sounding a bit edgy in the two previous posts. Oh wait... No it doesn't! Besides, how much more fun can there be than being an Ann Coulter Traitor? Well, how about being unafraid to rant against the massive quantities of b.s. and injustice spewing relentlessly from the once-hallowed halls of the White House? Mr. and Mrs. Left is Right and Sons are hard-working, honest American citizens who never cheat on taxes, drive a hybrid car, own no guns, put money into the grateful hands of strangers who are homeless, relentlessly teach our sons correct morals and values, and who support the right of anyone to speak their opinion, no matter how disgusting or different it might be. But we draw the line in the sand when the government, that we pay to work for us and take care of us, instead steamrolls over us in every imaginable manner, treating us and the rest of the world like dog crap.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Saudi's Free Ride Out

 

It looks like this story, which was fairly common knowledge immediately after 9-11 but more-or-less forgotten since, will be making the rounds soon in the media. Here are some excerpts from today's NY Times article (free registration required):
September 4, 2003 White House Approved Departure of Saudis After Sept. 11, Ex-Aide Says
By ERIC LICHTBLAU WASHINGTON, Sept. 3 — Top White House officials personally approved the evacuation of dozens of influential Saudis, including relatives of Osama bin Laden, from the United States in the days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks when most flights were still grounded, a former White House adviser said today.

The adviser, Richard Clarke, who ran the White House crisis team after the attacks but has since left the Bush administration, said he agreed to the extraordinary plan because the Federal Bureau of Investigation assured him that the departing Saudis were not linked to terrorism. The White House feared that the Saudis could face "retribution" for the hijackings if they remained in the United States, Mr. Clarke said. The fact that relatives of Mr. bin Laden and other Saudis had been rushed out of the country became public soon after the Sept. 11 attacks. But questions have lingered about the circumstances of their departure, and Mr. Clarke's statements provided the first acknowledgment that the White House had any direct involvement in the plan and that senior administration officials personally signed off on it.

Mr. Clarke first made his remarks about the plan in an article in Vanity Fair due out Thursday, and he expanded on those remarks today in an interview and in Congressional testimony. The White House said today that it had no comment on Mr. Clarke's statements. The disclosure came just weeks after the classified part of a Congressional report on the Sept. 11 attacks suggested that Saudi Arabia had financial links to the hijackers, and Mr. Clarke's comments are likely to fuel accusations that the United States has gone soft on the Saudis because of diplomatic concerns.

...

The article depicts an elaborate but hurried evacuation carried out within a week of the hijackings in which private planes picked up Saudis from 10 cities. Some aviation and bureau officials said they were upset by the operation because the government had not lifted flight restrictions for the general public, but those officials said they lacked the power to stop the evacuation, the article says. Mr. Clarke, who left the White House in February, said in an interview that he was driven by concern that the Saudis "would be targeted for retribution" by Americans after the hijackings. Mr. Clarke said he told the bureau to hold anyone it had suspicions about, and the F.B.I. said it did not hold anyone. Mr. Schumer said he doubted the thoroughness of a rushed review by the bureau, and in a letter to the White House today he said the Saudis appeared to have gotten "a free pass" despite their possible knowledge about the attacks.
Hmm. Now that we are more familiar with the workings of Bush & Co., let's put 2 and 2 together. Saudi terrorists, led by bin Laden, pull off 9-11. Bush helps Saudis (especially family of bin Laden) out of the country within a few days. Bush blames 9-11 on Iraq. Bush conquers oil-rich Iraq at the behest of very wealthy American companies who stand to profit greatly from reconstruction and oil. What's missing? Oh, yeah. Wealthy American companies, with Bush's support and Saudi assistance, pull off 9-11 as a prelude to buying Iraq. Bingo!

Left is Right is just so darned proud these days of being an American!
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Deadly Stats

 

From the Washington Post: The number of troops wounded in action in Iraq is now more than twice that of the Persian Gulf War in 1991.
Of course this says nothing about the tens of thousands of Iraqis killed or injured during this time. Unfortunately this data is just not being properly recorded. You can be assured that the information above grossly underrepresents the actual figures, since many non-combat deaths and injuries of American servicemen have not been reported since March 21. Left is Right asks Mr. Bush: Just how far are you willing to go with the slaughter of young Americans at the profit of Halliburton, Bechtel and all those oil companies who have you in their pockets? Even the really stupid Americans who fell for your pre-war guise and who believed that Iraq caused 9-11 are going to come to their senses one of these days. Or, you may run into one of your disillusioned, trigger-happy former supporters who lost his/her son/daughter in Iraq and who might pull a "Reagan". If so, they might even wait until Cheney is standing right behind you. Left is Right is not supporting such a violent action, but saying "You'd better watch your back."
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Get the Hell Out

 

Ted Rall analyzes the current state of Iraq (snippett):
Our early emphasis on seizing oil fields, and schemes to funnel revenue from the U.N. oil-for-food program into lucrative contracts with Halliburton (which still pays Dick Cheney a huge salary) and MCI-WorldCom (a major Bush-Cheney campaign donor) belie our stated commitment to liberation and spreading democracy. We're more Genghis Khan than Dwight Eisenhower.

Bush, a former businessman, is treating "liberated" Iraq like the victim of a hostile leveraged buy-out. In an LBO, you borrow a target company's purchase price and saddle its balance sheet with the resulting debt, layoffs and possible bankruptcy. In Iraq Bush hopes to defray rising costs of occupation--$1 billion a week for the Pentagon, plus $30 billion to fix water, electricity and oil production facilities--by selling Iraq's oil.

But it's Iraq's oil, not ours.

Our soldiers disposed of Saddam's army, but they haven't been nearly as effective as good will ambassadors. Partly because they don't speak Arabic or understand Islamic culture, jumpy U.S. soldiers are killing so many Iraqi civilians that the Pentagon is deliberately not keeping a count of accidental casualties. Our troops are swaggering about the desert like Gestapo thugs, robbing locals of their cash, kicking down doors, roughing up women (a no-no under Islam) and brown-bagging innocent men's heads before dragging them off screaming into the night.
and comes to the conclusion supported (for a long time now) by Left is Right:
The real answer is to get the hell out before one more American or Iraqi gets killed in a lost cause. "Leaving now would place Iraqis under violent usurpers and set a precedent that could haunt the U.S. government for years," argues The New York Times' Christopher Marquis, but we've already blown our chance to make a good first impression. More money, more men, more international involvement--those were good ideas back in March. Now it's too late to avoid the ostracizing of the United States or the Afghanistanization of Iraq.

For God's sake, cut our losses--and Iraq's--and bring our troops home.
And on an unrelated note, Johnny Depp disses Bush.

Finally, check out MoveOn's latest ad to hit today's papers (PDF format).
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Defeat the California Recall

 

Go here and sign. Now.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

This Should Irk Your Ire

 

Irony flourishes! From www.constitutionday.com:
7th Annual Constitution Day
CONSTITUTION DAY, SETPEMBER 17, 2003
A NATIONAL FIRST, BE A PART OF IT
The National, 7th annual celebration of Constitution Day will take place on Wednesday, September 17, 2003 at 2 P.M. Philadelphia time. The half hour program will begin with President George W Bush leading all the 120,000 schools in the nation in the simultaneous recitation of the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution broadcast by Fox News.

Immediately following the recitation of the Preamble there will be a roll call of the 50 United States beginning with Delaware, the first state to ratify the Constitution, ending with Hawaii the last to be admitted to the Union. The roll call takes place from Knotts Berry Farm in Buena Park California where there is a famous replica of Independence Hall and there is a huge celebration. When the roll call of states begins the Governor or other state official replies from each state capitol of a teleconference call. We have requested that C-Span broadcast the roll call of states but it has not been confirmed to date.

The teleconference call moves to the Freedom Foundation at Valley Forge, Pennsylvania who will lead the ringing of “Bells Across America,” to honor the First Amendment, Freedom of Speech and Religion. Your assistance to protect and perpetuate our precious Constitution is solicited.
Left is Right wants to hear your comments on this!
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Open Source Politics

 

If you haven't already visited this new site, Open Source Politics, I recommend you go there right now and cruise around. It's got a great layout, good writers and terrific content.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Tempel of Doom?

 

In case you didn't know, NASA/JPL plans on crashing an object into Comet Tempel 1 July 4th 2005, to take pictures of what happens:
Deep Impact will be the first mission to make a spectacular, football-stadium-sized crater, seven to 15 stories deep, into the speeding comet. Dramatic images from both the flyby spacecraft and the impactor will be sent back to distant Earth as data in near-realtime. These first-ever views deep beneath a comet's surface, and additional scientific measurements will provide clues to the formation of the solar system. Amateur astronomers will combine efforts with astronomers at larger telescopes to offer the public an earth-based look at this incredible July 2005 encounter with a comet.
Wouldn't it be ironic if the collision alters the comet's course such that it one day crashes into Earth or the Moon. Remember, this event is sponsored by the same people who couldn't avert a catastrophe resulting from a collision between a shuttle and a two-pound wedge of foam.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Are We Faster?

 
Left is Right has removed some of the more superfluous images and links on the sidebar, in an attempt to decrease the loading time. If anything is now missing that you want to see returned (especially if it's the reason you visit this site) then be sure to let us know immedidately before the HTML code is lost forever. If you like the improved loading time, please let us know that, too, by leaving a comment. If you don't care about any of this, then leave a comment about how you feel Bush is driving us all to ruin; if it's good, I'll post it. Thanks!

Sincerely, Your Friendly, Lefty, Traitorous (but Fair and Balanced) Infidel
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Extreme Wrong

 

When Cruz Bustamante announced his candidacy for governorship for California, the Extreme Right opened the "floodgates of smear" by releasing vicious lies about MEChA, of which Bustamante was a member 25 years ago. Jorge Mariscal explains it all.

Mark Kleiman also rants coherently about this whole affair. A good read.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Noam Chomsky

 

Read Noam Chomsky's interview with Antasofia in Outlook India.com. Snippett:
Antasofia: It is very hard to live in the U.S. for a left activist. I don't t feel very comfortable in your country. What is the condition of activism in the U.S.?

Noam Chomsky: The situation is really complicated. There are no labor-based groups and there is no labor based political party. People are completely disconnected and this lack of connection is a real problem. Don't forget that the Marxist movements were never very strong in U.S. in all of its history: there were ambiences in which independent Marxists gained influence but this didn't happen in the main part of the country.

Also remember that the U.S. government is an extreme radical and nationalist group with some similarities to European Fascism. It has proclaimed imperial ambitions, relying on its overwhelming predominance in the military dimension, and is unusual in its dedication to the needs of narrow sectors of wealth and private power. People in the United States work really hard, much harder than any other advanced industrial society, and this causes a lot of stress. People are always concerned about their work and they live in fear.

Although there is a lot of crime in the United States, it is approximately the same as comparable societies, but fear of crime is far higher. In many ways, this is the most frightened nation in the world! Moreover, the level of activism depends upon which part of the United States you are thinking of: United States is a very complicated country with many different tendencies.

For example, last week I was in the largest university in the country, which is not exactly the liberal center of the nation: Texas. In Houston and Austin, where I was, there were all kinds of community and campus-based activities. At the University of Texas there were thousands of people involved in protest after Congress authorized the use of force, and the student government passed a strong anti-war resolution.

One finds similar things all over the country, at a level that is quite without precedent. There has never been anything like such protest before a war is officially launched, and war-peace issues are only one element of the broad popular movements that are taking shape, committed to a wide range of issues and concerns.
Note: Outlookindia.com is a bit slow-loading, but well worth the wait.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 3, 2003
 

"I've had a perfectly wonderful evening. But, this wasn't it." - Groucho Marx

"Some cause happiness wherever they go; others, whenever they go." - Oscar Wilde

"Absolute faith corrupts as absolutely as absolute power." - Eric Hoffer
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 2, 2003
 

Successes of the Bush Administration. Referred by Eli Stephens
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Bring on the Hybrids

 

More Great News! From KFWB News: Toyota Looks To Boost U.S. Sales Of Hybrid Vehicles. (Tip of the hat to Jason for this lead.)
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Great News!

 

San Francisco Appeals Court Tosses out 100 Death Sentences
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Granny D Says Kucinich is the One

 

See this LIST OF KUCINICH SUPPORTERS. Now that I see that Granny D is a supporter, I am even more confident that I have chosen the right candidate.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Rove in Handcuffs?

 

Mark Kleiman updates us on the latest from the Valerie Plame affair. Plume is the CIA agent whose cover was blown by the White House in apparent retaliation againts the agent's husband, Joseph C. Wilson, IV, who blew open the Niger-uranium scandal.

On a side note, the link above is from a new progressive site that you must check out immediately: Open Source Politics. I will be adding it to my Daily Readings links page on the side bar.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

See Me, Feel Me, Touch Me, GROPE ME

 

Buzzflash summarizes the past and more recent sexual indiscretions by Arnold S. We've already seen him flip-flop on numerous other issues, such as gays and taxes. However, as actions speak so much louder than words, and since his actions have mostly been the womanizing kind (bulletin: he has no real political experience), you can rest assured that his anti-feminist stand (as seen through his actions on women throughout his life) is the one issue on which you can judge his qualifications for governorship. Is it now time for a touchy-feely-gropy governor?
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Bush Hires Hussein Gestapo Agents to Hunt for Hussein Gestapo Agents.

 

Just as soon as you stop shaking your head in disgust, along comes another story like THIS. The question now is not WHEN will the madness end, but rather WILL the madness end.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

GAO Strikes Out; Sierra Club at Bat

 

The GAO failed, but "Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group, and the Sierra Club, a large environmental organization", may be more successful. Here's the gist:
From the Aug. 31, 2003 editions of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

In what may well be its last word on the matter, the General Accounting Office issued a report the other day on its battle with Vice President Dick Cheney - or, more accurately, an after-action report, since the GAO already had capitulated. But fortunately, others are still fighting for what we believe is a worthy objective: the release by the vice president's office of basic information on the energy task force Cheney headed two years ago. Cheney won against the GAO. Now he should declare victory and make the task force information public in the interests of open government.

The GAO's dispute with Cheney dates to the Bush administration's earliest days and the task force created in late January 2001 to shape a new energy policy. In little more than three months, the Cheney group met with many people - more of them energy industry executives than environmentalists. That was hardly a surprise, given the administration's ties to the industry. What did come as a surprise was Cheney's refusal to provide the GAO, which is the investigative arm of Congress, with the names of those the task force interviewed, the general topics discussed and the costs associated with the process. The vice president argued that providing such information would jeopardize the executive branch's ability to consult candidly with non-government advisers. The GAO and many members of Congress believed - correctly, in our view - that the public has a right to know who is advising the government on a key policy issue. After all, such information could prove important in the public's assessment of that policy. To end the standoff, the GAO went to court for the first time in its 81-year history. But a federal judge tossed out the case, saying the courts may not have the power to rule on document disputes between the other two branches of government. The GAO chose not to appeal.

What little the GAO was able to glean is contained in last week's report, which describes the task force operation as "a centralized, top-down" process. The vice president's counsel has asserted in a letter to Congress that the task force met with a "broad representation" of people. But according to the GAO, the task force "met with, solicited input from or received information and advice from non-federal energy stakeholders, principally petroleum, coal, nuclear, natural gas and electricity industry representatives and lobbyists."

Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group, and the Sierra Club, a large environmental organization, have joined in a legal action that seeks the same information the GAO sought. Last month, an appeals court panel suggested that this political odd couple may have legal standing. The case is now with the full appeals court. The Bush administration is famously secretive, and appropriately so in situations that might genuinely imperil national security. But what's wanted here is pretty basic - and still useful, since Congress has yet to enact an energy bill.
Note to self: THis is NOT a government of, by and for the people, but of, by and for big business and the top 1% income bracket. Canada and New Zealand: You're looking better every day.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Deadly Hummer

 

From CNN:
In other violence, two U.S. military police officers died and one was wounded Monday after their Humvee hit a bomb on a highway in southern Baghdad, the press information center for the U.S.-led Coalition Provisional Authority said Tuesday
I wonder if they would still be alive today if they had been driving a Prius. Heck, those Hummers are so high you need binoculars just to see what's on the ground. Seriously, Bush has entrenched this nation in a situation that will never have a happy ending (that possible ending was destroyed March 20, 2003). At this point the only thing possible to make the ending as least painful as possible is to hand over total control of Iraq to the U.N.

Now.
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

September 1, 2003

Vacation Photo

 

Pancake Rocks in Punakaiki, West Coast of South Island, New Zealand
[Go to Top]   [HOME]

Well the weight of the world is FALLING
And on my back I've been CRAWLING
The state of affairs is APPALLING
And the 6 o'clock news keeps CALLING

Well I've been trying to see the world through their eyes
Where black is white and day is night
Left is Right
Left is Right
Left is Right, For me

Well negotiations keep STALLING
The United Nations keeps CALLING
The Skeletons you're HAULING
Won't hold when you're FALLING

Put your head in the sand and you'll never know
What's waiting for you in the depths below (below)
Don't believe everything that you read
Take what you want and keep what you need

TWISTED NIXON



CHICK HEARN, THANKS SO MUCH FOR ALL THE MEMORIES.

Google Pages Union member home - join
previous - next - random site - list sites - top sites POWERED BY RINGSWORLD
Win Without War Webring
[ Join Now | Ring Hub | Random | << Prev | Next >> ]
The Progressive Politics WebRing
[ Join Now | Ring Hub | Random | << Prev | Next >> ]
The Anti-Republican Webring by princss_silvia
[ Join Now | Ring Hub | Random | << Prev | Next >> ]
The Vast Left Wing Conspiracy
[ Join Now | Ring Hub | Random | << Prev | Next >> ]
Blog*Spot by wrug
List AllRandom Blog*Spot SiteJoin
PreviousNext
Skip PrevSkip Next
Proudly spotlighting the users of BlogSpot
Blog*Spot hosted by WebRingNeed Help?
The Progressive Blog Alliance
Leave a comment here to join.
-->