LEFT is RIGHT (blogging against The Bush-war) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
###
Iraq War Cost
Buy it Here for $12.95 ::::: MY PROFILE ::::: VIDEO: When the Good Guys Do NOTHING Welcome to the New World Order Truth, War & Consequences In the Name of Freedom Oreo Calculator Army of One Remind Us One Year THANKS ESSAY/SITE: Bush's 40/IRAQ/SOTU/OTHER Lies A Declaration of Progressive Principles A Declaration of Impeachment World's Leading Terrorist Why Bush Invaded Iraq Coalition Deaths in Iraq Altruism is Out of Focus Official Bush Lie Outlet The Devil's Handbook Third World Traveler Paying for Wal-mart Those Elusive WMDs Ongoing Scandals The Bush Record Bush Scorecard Who Served Halliburton AWOL Evil
I reserve the right to publish your e-mail.
Archives My Ecosystem Details Who's Linking to Left is Right Who links to me? Who's on Left is Right right now # Visits by day of month Most Recent Visitors Recent Visitors by Location United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights Humanist Manifesto III The Brand New Bag Books about the Iraq War
| Front Pages / 10 x 10 / Open Secrets / VillageVoice / The New Standard / The Hill / Washington Note
|
"You know, I just recently came off a trip to the Far East. By the way, representing the United States of America around the world is one of the great experiences of the presidency. And it struck me that I was in a region of the world where there -- where wars had started. You know, my dad and Senator McCain's relatives, I'm sure many of your relatives, fought the Japanese. They were our sworn enemy. And yet there I was in Kyoto, Japan, sitting with my friend, Prime Minister Koizumi, talking about the peace, talking about what we can do in the Far East to work together to keep the peace, and what we can do in the Middle East to help rid that region of resentment and hatred, to help change the breeding grounds for the recruitment of suiciders into a hopeful place. Isn't that amazing? Think about that. Who would have thought 50 years ago, or 60 years ago, a President of the United States could have stood here in Phoenix, Arizona, and said he sat down at the table with the Prime Minister of Japan talking about the peace. Nobody would have thought that way then." |
“Duke Cunningham is a hero. He is an honorable man of high integrity.” - - - Tom DeLay |
"The sum of the catastrophic policies [torture, rendition, preemptive war, etc.] endorsed by the Bush administration, together with the still-unfolding consequences of those policies around the world, may have placed us at the most critical juncture in our nation's history in more than a century. At this point, and because of the widespread acceptance of our government's actions (even if only passive in nature, which is perhaps the worst kind of acceptance) and the underlying corruption such acceptance reveals, it is impossible to know if we will begin to alter our course, and regain the decency and respect for elementary concepts of human dignity we have set aside with such unforgivable carelessness. The fact that we don't know if we will begin to save our honor, and our souls, may be the worst judgment of all. Many Americans still prefer to believe otherwise, but we are not immune to the forces, the fears and the hatreds that have destroyed other countries. All great civilizations of the past have had their time of glory and have faded into dust. Some have faded quickly, vanishing almost overnight, while others disappeared very slowly and imperceptibly. But they are all gone now. It is only our belief that we are somehow special, that we are unique, that prevents us from recognizing this starkly obvious historical reality. Even if it were true that we are unique, and even if we are unique in critical ways, none of that alters the course of history -- and it does not change the ultimate outcome once barbarism is embraced and set loose. But we acknowledge none of this, and insist that the rules that apply to all others do not apply to us, for some reason which is neither convincing nor, more importantly, true. Our self-imposed blindness may well destroy us, and we will not finally see the truth until it is too late. If we should fade into dust much sooner than we might have, history will note that we could have chosen otherwise -- but that we resolutely refused to do so. History will judge us accordingly, as it judges all those who have gone before. But the shame will be ours, now and always." |
"...if liberals really didn't support the troops they would lie the country into a war, send troops to war without proper equipment, and then keep them there to die for no apparent reason." - - - (source unknown) |
As for your legacy two decades from now, George, let me clue you in on something--as a historian. In 20 years no Iraqis will have you on their minds one way or another. Do you think anyone in Egypt or Israel is still grateful to Jimmy Carter for helping bring to an end the cycle of Egyptian-Israeli wars? Jimmy Carter powerfully affected the destinies of all Egyptians and Israelis in that key way. Most people in both countries have probably never heard of him, and certainly no one talks about the first Camp David Accords anymore except as a dry historical subject. The US pro-Israel lobby is so ungrateful that they curse Carter roundly for all the help he gave Israel. Human beings don't have good memories for these things, which is why we have to have professional historians, a handful of people who are obsessed with the subject. And I guarantee you, George, that historians are going to be unkind to you. You went into a major war over a non-existent nuclear weapons program. Presidents' reputations don't survive things like that. Historians are creatures of documents and precision. A wild exaggeration with serious consequences is against everything they stand for as a profession. So forget about history and destiny and the divine will. You are at the helm of the Exxon Valdez and it is headed for the shoals. You can't afford to daydream about future decades. |
by John S. Hatch President Bush was recently criticized for not being forceful enough in denouncing Chinese human rights abuses during a trip there. Excuse me? This is the torture president. How on earth can the United States preach to anyone in the world about human rights or the rule of law, or morality? In even raising the question, has Mr. Bush abandoned any claim to sanity? If it is wrong for China to abuse human rights (and it’s true that their record is horrible) how is it acceptable for the US in Iraq to sexually torture imprisoned children as a means to coerce their (probably completely innocent) parents to disclose information they most likely don’t have? There is within the mythology America finds so indispensable something so sick and downright evil, but so pervasive that even after all the revelations of torture and rape and murder sanctioned at the highest levels of government, even now the numbness persists, and writers still insist on thinking that America is somehow a shining example of decency to a world which needs its sanctimonious preaching. Who in their right mind would want to emulate America in this century? Who on earth would want to be an American in this darkest of times? America is like a born-again Christian fundamentalist—mean, ignorant, full of hate and rage and superstition, but utterly convinced of his own righteousness. In short, insane. Dangerously insane. In Iraq American sanctioned and trained elements of the Iraqi military are back to using electric drills on ‘insurgents’, an old Saddam phenomenon. Drill for oil, drill for blood. They’ll drill your knee, or your arm, or your head. You are innocent. Doesn’t matter. Think George cares? White phosphorous. Depleted uranium. Shock and awe. Cluster bombs. Etcetera. Where are those photographs and videos of children undergoing torture at Abu Grahaib that a judge ordered released months ago? Whatever happened to the rule of law? Where did accountability go? Where the hell is the outrage? Why are Bush and Rumsfeld and Rice and a bunch of others not in jail cells? Where is the outrage? For those who think that change is coming in ’06 or ’08, think again—these people cannot relinquish power, whatever further lies and outrages they must commit to retain it. There are simply too many crimes against humanity and war crimes for which to avoid accountability at all costs. Lives depend on it. Many more crimes are yet to be reported. Do not for a moment consider that this bunch would not, if they saw it in their interests, engineer another deadly 911 incident (blamed on Muslims, of course) to once again terrorize the populace into meek submission. It may be pathologically manipulative and barbaric, but that’s Straussian politics. To them it’s not only acceptable, it’s business as usual. It’s probably going to happen, as Bush’s numbers continue to decline. America has seen bad times—slavery, the civil war, McCarthyism and communist hysteria, never-ending racism, Nixon and Kissinger, the unheralded horror of Reagan, but Bush has brought disaster on a completely different level. Bush is a dupe, if an evil one, but there are truly ugly, nasty people pulling his strings. Nothing short of a second American revolution is going to rescue your nation. Even now Bush is making plans to violently stop such a thing from happening. We’re going to see once and for all if Americans stand for the vaunted values to which they give such eloquent and loud lip service. If so, then I fear they will have to pay in blood. It’s come to that. I’m sorry. |
"I recoil with horror at the ferociousness of man. Will nations never devise a more rational umpire of differences than force? Are there no means of coercing injustice more gratifying to our nature than a waste of the blood of thousands and of the labor of millions of our fellow creatures?" - - - Thomas Jefferson |
This week's revelation that Bush wanted to bomb Al Jazeera in 2004 is only the very latest disclosure in a seemingly endless number of reports about all the illegal, if not grossly immoral, actions and plans that have spewed from the White House since January 20th, 2001.
The wake-up call for me (besides the obviously stolen election of 2000) was the day Bush announced in 2001 that the U.S. would not consider honoring the Kyoto Protocol. That is when my deep suspicions of this Administration began. Between the inauguration and that date, there were the now-documented decisions to start preparations for invading Iraq, but that information wasn't revealed in the media until much later. I was lukewarm at best about the Afghanistan invasion until it became obvious after a couple of weeks that there was no real intention of capturing Bin Laden.
Since that time I have regretfully opposed virtually every act and decision made by the Bush Administration... "regretfully" because I despise distrusting my own government. But as a compassionate and observant human being, I know in my heart that not a single action by Bush's government since 1-20-01 has been taken in the interests of us citizens. Every act, every decision, every speech, every dollar spent, has been solely for the financial advancement of Bush and all the corporate sponsors and cronies he placed in all levels of government.
This has been clear as a bell to me for over four years now, and yet many leading Democrats in Congress, and a significant portion of the non-Right still cannot see this forest of fascism through the trees.
My sources of information are not secret. Anyone with a radio and a computer connected to the internet has access to the same information as I. Sure, Pacifica Radio occasionally veers off on a conspiracy tangent, but the majority of the news they report is factually based. NPR, although Right-leaning, is a decent source of information if you take the time and effort to study its sources. The vast majority of my information comes from the opinions and references available on the internet. I've spent a lot of time determining the validity, accuracy and reliability of my sources, and anyone with an open mind and a critical eye can do the same.
Besides the endless killing and degradation of humans brought forth by Bush et al., every day I cringe mentally and notice that pit in my stomach when I listen to anyone who speaks from the White House, because I know that everything spoken is either a lie or propaganda. Everything. EVERYTHING. Bush and his godless, fearless, thankless and compassionless cohorts have yet to prove me wrong, and for me that is the most gut-wrenching fact of all.
Sometimes I wish I was just dumb, oblivious and, hence, content and happy.
Left is Right will now take a holiday break. Happy Thanksgiving, y'all.
"But it isn't about Murtha. Murtha's irrelevant in all this. This is about our troops and our national security. Murtha's just getting his 15 minutes of fame like Cindy Sheehan got, and like Bill Burkett got. Bill Burkett got almost a year. The Jersey Girls, Richard Clarke, Joseph Wilson, you name it -- just the latest member of the endless parade of personalities around whom the Democrats can circle and support." - - - Rush Limbaugh |
"....I was in New York City the other day and my taxi cab driver bypassed a long line of cars exiting the freeway to cut in at the last second. As usual, I enjoyed being an innocent bystander/beneficiary to this little crime. But what happened next was even more gratifying to the economist in me. A police officer was standing in the middle of the road, waving every car that cut in line over to the shoulder, where a second officer was handing out tickets like an assembly line. By my rough estimate, these two officers were giving out 30 tickets an hour at $115 a pop. At over $1,500 per officer per hour (assuming the tickets get paid), this was a fantastic money making proposition for the city. And it nails just the right people. Speeding doesn’t really hurt other people very much, except indirectly. So to my mind it makes much more sense to go directly after the mean-spirited behavior like cutting in line. This is very much in the spirit of Bratton’s “broken windows” policing philosophy. I’m not sure it cuts down the number of cheaters on the roads in any fundamental way since the probability of getting caught remains vanishly small. Still, the beauty of it is that (1) every driver that follows the rules feels a rush of glee over the rude drivers getting nailed, and (2) it is a very efficient way of taxing bad behavior. So, my policy recommendation to police departments across the country is to find the spots on the roads that lend themselves to this sort of policing and let the fun begin." |
I wish I had the time or energy or memory capacity to describe to you how wrong this whole thing has gone. It's just as you described it a couple years ago. We *can* make a difference here, and i believe in the mission as it looks on paper. But your president and his brain-dead colleagues aren't even trying to give us what we need to do it. The add-on armor HMMWVs are a joke. The terrorists target them b/c they know they offer no protection. The M1114s have good armor, but every time we lose one (i had one blown up monday, driver had his femoral artery cut -- will recover fully -- b/c there apparently is no armor or very weak armor under the pedals) it's impossible to replace them. So now I have to send yet another add-on armored vehicle outside the wire daily. The M1114s also have certain mechanical defects, known to the manufacturer, for which there is apparently no known fix. For example, on some of them (like mine) if it stalls or you turn it off, you cannot restart it if the engine is hot. We have to dump 3 liters of cold water on a solenoid in order to start it again. Not that much fun when your vehicle won't start in indian country. I wonder if DoD is getting a refund for the contract. Speaking of contracts, KBR is a joke. I can't even enumerate the problems with their service, but I guarantee they do not receive less money based on how many of the showers don't work, or how many of us won't eat in the chow hall often because we get sick every time we do. There is so much. I could go on forever. the worst thing, which we have discussed, is that they are playing these bullshit numbers games to fool America about troop strength. If they stopped paying KBR employees $100,000 to do the job of a $28,000 soldier, maybe they'd have enough money to send us enough soldiers to do the job. As it stands we have no offensive capability in the most dangerous city on earth. General Shinseki should write an Op/Ed that basically says, "I told you so." Idiots. Where are the AC-130s? The apaches? They have them in FAR less active AOs (areas of operations). All we ever get is a single Huey and Cobra team, both of which are older than I am. it's such a joke. They're not even trying. At all. They have apaches in Tikrit but Hueys in Ramadi. I wish every american could see this for him/herself. Registering your frustration at the ballot box isn't nearly enough. There should be jail terms for this. |
As disgusted As I've been over the past few years with the L.A. Times and their skewed-to-the-right reporting and editorial policy, I've finally had enough. Last week the Times' Op Ed Publisher Jeff Johnson and Tribune Company CEO Dennis FitzSimons fired Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Robert Sheer because his support of the truth clashed with the paper's support of the Bush-war Administration's outrageous and deadly foreign and domestic policies and actions. Enough is enough. I canceled my subscription this week.
That leaves only the other right-wing papers in the area (Long Beach Press Telegram, Orange Count Register, Daily News) as alternatives, so it looks like I'll be saving a couple of trees for a while at least.
"...after a blocking of every avenue of debate, after questioning the patriotism of every critic, this is now the Republican War, through and through. If you're a Republican, you like this war just fine, and you don't care how long it takes, how many American troops get killed, or how incompetently the war is run. If you're a Republican, you think of the war as a vehicle of nationalist virtue, not to be questioned by the likes of fellow Americans who demand answers better than "everything is fine". If you are a Republican, you meet the calls for an exit strategy with cries of cowardice. You meet calls for investigation into prewar failures with the brazen and shallow admonishment that anyone requiring accountability for failure does not adequately "support the troops". It is raw nationalism, and raw partisanship, of the ugliest and most cowardly fashion. Men who would send the sons and daughters of others across the world to die for a still never-quite-defined principle, but lack the courage to themselves defend their own convictions and actions to their fellow Americans. So now -- faced with the real threat of a debate over the war -- they turn to whatever partisan maneuvering they can muster in order to block that debate, yet again, and attack those that demanded it. Clap Louder, they demand, or Shut Up." - - - Hunter |
"It's each and every one of us, complicit by citizenship and abetting through our silence when another new abuse justified as being performed in our name is revealed. We've been fooling ourselves for years about many things, and what saddens me the most is that, while certain victories are now finally being achieved, the war within us is being lost in the ensuing hoopla. It's good that Bu$hCo is being confronted and bested by the Democrats and moderate Republicans. But that in and of itself isn't cause for celebration. I'm concerned that we are merely changing bucking broncos in the middle of a raging torrent on the edge of a tall cascade and are about to tumble onto the rocks below." - - - pessimist |
"If the Democrats come into power in the United States and re-employ their vision of defense for this country, we will have 9-1-1s unabated. That's not maybe. We know what took place in the past. And I still don't understand exactly what it is that the Americans expect President Bush to do any different than he's already done..." - - - Wayne Simmons, former CIA operative, on The O'Reilly Factor |
"Look closer: It's been over four years now that the GOP has had it all locked down tight, the stranglehold to end all strangleholds, owned Congress and stacked the courts and shut down the media and demonized all voices of dissent and ran the president the way a pimp runs a prostitution ring. No light escaped. They had masterminded one of the most brutal and mean-spirited and thoroughly effective subjugations of the American idea in 100 years, and it looked as though their power and reach knew no limits. It was astounding: No matter what atrocity or torture or war or violent abuse of nature, they would simply gloat and the media would cower and the people would merely look on, beaten and glazed and tired, and accept it as dark manna. But now something has shifted. The iron grip is slipping, sooner and more quickly than any of the right's political architects predicted, surely sooner than Rove had strategized, far sooner than the 20-year master plan the GOP had in place. What happened? Simple: The horrible policies, the lies and the lies on top of the lies (if "we do not torture" doesn't beat "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" as the impeachable BS of the century, we are lost) became just too much. The center could not hold. The atrocities are now paying their moral dividends. The GOP is now reaping what it has sown. Which is another way of saying: The system works. After all, you cannot keep pumping junk food into the body and expect it to stay upright and functional. You cannot force so many toxins into the planet and not expect it to break out in rashes and pimples and heat waves and violent storms. Eventually, the body recoils. The spirit shudders and throws off. The disease runs its course and, barring any permanent scars and mental derangement, the fever breaks. Look, I shall not argue that this hope, this light is coming from millions of people finally waking up to the progressive truth. I shall not be so foolish as to suggest that a grand anti-war pro-sex pro-intelligence happily spiritual but deeply nonreligious enlightenment is taking place. I am not so naive, and as I said, there are three treacherous years left. The reality is less pretty than that. But there is a hint of a whisper of a possibility of a deeper change, of the pendulum swinging back, finally, to humanity and love and something resembling progress, which is more than we've had in five years, and certainly more than many of us expected, given the alleged strength of the GOP choke hold. So thank you, George, for bringing such delicious sips of renewed hope. Thank you for reminding us all, through such a litany of painful and nauseating policies and lies, that the universe still repays such abuse with well-deserved slaps upside your aw-shucks head. You give us hope. Because as you and your administration careen and implode and sputter and stutter and fail, well, the world is only the better for it." |
"In the First Amendment, the Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to fulfill its essential role in our democracy. The press was to serve the governed, not the governors. The Government's power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government. And paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell." - - - Justice Black, NYT v. US. 403 US 7 |
Fitzgerald Investigation gets second wind as Bob Woodward reveals another Plamegate leak
Senior Democrat calls for U.S. troops to leave Iraq
Education, health spending bill rejected by "Democratic controlled" House
FEC ruling supports internet free speech
Bush popularity now equal to that of used car salesmen
Bush's Justice Dept tries to restrict Georgia voters' rights
Bush Administration's lies are increasing in intensity
"The White House wants a firefight with Democrats, and assumes that Democrats will wither after a few days. With the Senate GOP now showing its true colors that it has no intention of actually pressing the White House for deliverables on Iraq, and with Pat Roberts stonewalling the Phase Two inquiry of how the White House used all the available intelligence, Democrats should give the White House the firefight it wants. But while they are at it, Democrats should go ahead and expand the firefight to raise the stakes into an overall attack against the credibility of the Administration on a variety of fronts. Democrats could not only go after the lies that led up to the March 18, 2003 letter to Congress that started the war. They could also talk about how the Administration lied to Congress about the Medicare drug benefit. They could talk about the lies told to sell the country on the upper income tax cuts. They could talk about the lies told by the administration about who leaked Valerie Plame’s name. They could talk about the lies told by the administration about Social Security. They could talk about the lies told by the administration about how much the Iraq would, and continues to cost the taxpayers. You get the idea. By returning fire on an issue of weakness, which is a signature Rovian tactic, the White House now invites a full-scale attack by Democrats on the issue of this administration’s pattern of deceit and lies to the American people. The Democrats should welcome this door opening by Rove, and drive a truck right through it." - - - Steve Soto |
by Congresswoman Linda Sánchez The Republican leadership in Congress is yet again abusing its power to get its way, this time at the expense of America's middle class. Last week, Congress was supposed to consider an amendment to the budget resolution that would have included $50 billion in mandatory cuts to many crucial government services, targeted at health care and student aid, while maintaining $70 billion in tax cuts, mostly for the wealthiest Americans. But suddenly, the House GOP leadership had to pull the budget amendment from the schedule because they didn't have the necessary 218 votes. It is clear that a majority of Members in Congress, both Democrats and Republicans, realize the negative impact such a budget would have on all Americans. House Republicans are expected to go forward with their budget, cutting essential services for America's working families and at the same time giving $70 billion in new tax giveaways for the wealthy. While the Republicans claim that their $50 billion cuts to critical government programs are needed to pay for costs related to Katrina and Rita, those cuts will actually have to cover the $70 billion in tax giveaways for America's wealthiest. As if they weren't content enough having squandered the largest budget surplus in our nation's history, the Republicans' new plan would actually increase our national debt by an additional $20 billion dollars! In other words, rather than ask all Americans to sacrifice a little to help our fellow Americans hit by natural disaster, the Republicans are going to shower the richest individuals with tax giveaways and make working families carry the burden. At a time when our nation's wages are stagnant and gas prices are stuck at nearly $3 a gallon, now is not the time to cut critical government services that millions of Americans rely on. Republicans are planning to cut Medicaid, while the number of people without health insurance has increased for four years in a row. Republicans are planning to cut student loans, while college tuition costs continue to rise faster than household incomes. Republicans are also planning to cut food stamps, while more American families are struggling to put food on the table, including thousands of families still trying to recover from Hurricane Katrina. As we rebuild the Gulf Coast region we must also look to methods that will restimulate our economy, but the answer is not in cutting essential services. Rather, we should look to the $70 billion in tax breaks that the Republicans are giving to the wealthiest Americans. In April, House Democrats offered a strict pay-as-you-go budget with much-needed middle class tax cuts and a balanced budget. Yet, the Republicans forged ahead with their plan of tax breaks for the rich and adding to the national debt paid for on the backs of America's working class. This latest charade by this Republican Congress is fiscally irresponsible and needs to be stopped. America deserves better. My Democratic colleagues and I are ready to get this country back on the right fiscal track. |
What keeps most Americans (who think about this) on edge, is wondering what crisis the Bush Administration is going to cook up next in order to deflect attention from the myriad scandals currently brewing. Michael T. Klare gives very reasonable descriptions of three of the most likely scenarios, barring a terrorist attack within our borders.
See also: Syria: The Next Cambodia?
"Saddam, facing a possible death sentence, is accused of mass murder, torture, false imprisonment and the use of chemical weapons. He is certainly guilty on all counts. So, it now seems, are those who overthrew him." - - - George Monbiot |
To: oreilly@foxnews.com Subject: enemies list Please add me to your enemies list. I am a pinko atheist tree-hugging, war-hating, Gore-supporting, Progressive LIBERAL who actually enjoys sex and the truth and who doesn't think the existence of a married gay couple will cause my family to disintegrate. Sincerely, Mike of LEFT is RIGHT |
It's Congress's fault for believing my Administration's deceptions.
"...in the late 1950s, many senators thought President Dwight Eisenhower was either a knave or a fool for denying the existence of a "missile gap." U.S. Air Force Intelligence estimates—leaked to the press and supplied to the Air Force's allies on Capitol Hill—indicated that the Soviet Union would have at least 500 intercontinental ballistic missiles by 1962, far more than the U.S. arsenal. What the "missile gap" hawks didn't know—and Eisenhower did—was that the Central Intelligence Agency had recently acquired new evidence indicating that the Soviets couldn't possibly have more than 50 ICBMs by then—fewer than we would. (As it turned out, photoreconnaissance satellites, which were secretly launched in 1960, revealed that even that number was too high; the Soviets had only a couple of dozen ICBMs.) So, yes, nearly everyone thought Saddam was building WMDs, just as everyone back in the late '50s thought Nikita Khrushchev was building hundreds of ICBMs. In Saddam's case, many of us outsiders (I include myself among them) figured he'd had biological and chemical weapons before; producing such weapons isn't rocket science; U.N. inspectors had been booted out of Iraq a few years earlier; why wouldn't he have them now? What we didn't know—and what the Democrats in Congress didn't know either—was that many insiders did have reasons to conclude otherwise. There is also now much reason to believe that top officials—especially Vice President Dick Cheney and the undersecretaries surrounding Donald Rumsfeld in the Pentagon—worked hard to keep those conclusions trapped inside. President Bush's national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, said today that the arguments over how and why the war began are irrelevant. "We need to put this debate behind us," he said. But the truth is, no debate could be more relevant now. As the war in Iraq enters yet another crucial phase—with elections scheduled next month and Congress finally taking up the issue of whether to send more troops or start pulling them out—we need to know whether the people running the executive branch can be trusted, and the sad truth is that they cannot be." - - - Fred Kaplan |
L.A. Progressives invite you to protest tomorrow at noon in front of L.A. Times building for the corporate-sanctioned firing of highly respected columnist Robert Sheer.
"Last Tuesday, Harry Reid demonstrated wonderful signs of life. The question now is, are they going to build on this, or is it going to be an isolated episode that doesn't lead to a fundamental shift? Will enough Democrats now be willing to admit that voting to authorize the war was a mistake? Whether they were genuinely misled, they bought into it, or they were too cowardly to vote for what they believed was true, it was a mistake. Will they now have the courage to say, "This was wrong, and that we need to get our brave troops out of Iraq now." Are the Democrats going to offer an alternative plan to get us out of Iraq? Are they going to fill this vacuum created by the chaos in Iraq and a scandal-plagued administration in tatters, or are they going to wait for the Republicans to do it their way, reap the political dividends, and leave the Democrats sniping outside the palace gate?" - - - John Cusack |
"One of the biggest changes in politics in my lifetime is that the delusional is no longer marginal. It has come in from the fringe, to sit in the seat of power in the Oval Office and in Congress. For the first time in our history, ideology and theology hold a monopoly of power in Washington. Theology asserts propositions that cannot be proven true; ideologues hold stoutly to a worldview despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality. The offspring of ideology and theology are not always bad but they are always blind. And that is the danger: voters and politicians alike, oblivious to the facts." - - - Bill Moyers |
"The argument for going to war with Iraq was based on intelligence that we now know was inaccurate. The information the American people were hearing from the president -- and that I was being given by our intelligence community -- wasn't the whole story. Had I known this at the time, I never would have voted for this war. George Bush won't accept responsibility for his mistakes. Along with Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, he has made horrible mistakes at almost every step: failed diplomacy; not going in with enough troops; not giving our forces the equipment they need; not having a plan for peace. Because of these failures, Iraq is a mess and has become a far greater threat than it ever was. It is now a haven for terrorists, and our presence there is draining the goodwill our country once enjoyed, diminishing our global standing. It has made fighting the global war against terrorist organizations more difficult, not less. The urgent question isn't how we got here but what we do now. We have to give our troops a way to end their mission honorably. That means leaving behind a success, not a failure. What is success? I don't think it is Iraq as a Jeffersonian democracy. I think it is an Iraq that is relatively stable, largely self-sufficient, comparatively open and free, and in control of its own destiny." - - - JOHN EDWARDS |
"Hey, you know, if you want to ban military recruiting, fine, but I'm not going to give you another nickel of federal money. You know, if I'm the president of the United States, I walk right into Union Square, I set up my little presidential podium, and I say, "Listen, citizens of San Francisco, if you vote against military recruiting, you're not going to get another nickel in federal funds. Fine. You want to be your own country? Go right ahead." And if Al Qaeda comes in here and blows you up, we're not going to do anything about it. We're going to say, look, every other place in America is off limits to you, except San Francisco. You want to blow up the Coit Tower? Go ahead." - - - Fox News host Bill O'Reilly |
"Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Michael Savage, Michelle Malkin. This new brand of distinctly anti-American hate speech, this "new" non-conservative conservatism has been working its way in a moist clump down America's pant leg for a while now. Eventually, we'll be rid of it, but in the meantime it's still going to stink like hell." - - - HUNTER |
In other words, not a damn thing has changed, no matter what country we invade and get tied down in, no matter how ineptly we help Al Qaeda spread in the region, no matter how many times Bush walks hand in hand with the Saudis, no matter how many times Laura Bush tells the Egyptians how great they are for democracy and the rights of women, and no matter how many different clothes and hair styles Condi wears. In fact, can anyone point to a single major accomplishment by Condi Twin Mirrors since she was all-too-willing to push her mentor out of Foggy Bottom, aside from her wardrobe, her ability to shop for new shoes while people were dying from Katrina, and her ability to garner great press coverage while seemingly getting nothing done in North Korea, China, Europe, and now the Middle East? |
If Fox News' latest poll puts Bush's approval rating at 36%, I wonder what it really is. Remember when it dipped below 50 and we were rubbing our eyes in disbelief? If I had fallen into a coma eight months ago and woken today....
Wow, nearly TWO-THIRDS of Americans now DISAPPROVE of George Bush. I wish they would ask, in these polls, how many of us truly hate him.Often the public may disapprove of a leader's job when that leader makes unpopular and difficult-to-understand decisions that later turn out to be deft. During the past five years I cannot think of even one deft decision by Mr. Bush-war. Every single thing he has touched has been transformed into death, destruction, misery of suffering for everyone except for those fortunate wealthy Republicans. The only positive thing he ever accomplished was making people of below-average intelligence think that they can one day also become President.
U.S. History textbooks will have to devote entire chapters to his horrific Administration. The Bush II Presidential Library will have to be located on an offshore haven and will only contain children's fairy tales. The name "Bush" will forever be used only in negative context. Bush has effectively put the finishing touches on the conversion of a respectable (albeit conservative) political party, without whose existence would not have driven the Democrats to force so many social advancements during the past four decades, into a group of money-craving, values-starved, compassionless subhumans. I find it so hard to understand how an educated, intelligent middle class American can associate him/herself with such a decadent political congregation.
Bush and his merry band of amoral misfits have unintentionally changed the appearance of the current dead-in-the-water jellyfish Democratic Party into an attractive alternative for political change. I know that Dick Cheney is the mastermind behind Bush, but in any organization the leader, by default, must accept the responsibility of the consequences.Bush will forever be reviled by Muslims and Arabs (and now Blacks, for that matter). For the rest of our lives the remainder of the world will always doubt our intentions as a nation, no matter how honorable. Today we American citizens are morally screwed. Tomorrow our children will be financially screwed. We have met the enemy and they are not us, but they sure as hell look like us and speak our language.
....We, the undersigned, believe the Democratic Party has a moral obligation to stand firm in opposition to the reckless and destructive policies of the Bush administration in Iraq. And, since you are the face of that party, we believe you have the obligation to articulate that opposition on behalf of Democrats and patriotic Americans of all political persuasions. We therefore call upon you to meet your moral obligations to a country which has so warmly embraced and so greatly entrusted you, to make a clear and unequivocal statement of opposition to the madness of George Bush's adventure in Iraq, and to do so now, before even greater damage can be done to that country and to ours. Americans are dying by the thousands in Iraq. Iraqi civilians are being slaughtered by the tens of thousands. America, once a beacon of human rights ideals in a hard and cold world, descends today into a moral bankruptcy which matches its fiscal condition, both caused in large part by this war based on deceit. Polls show that most Americans now understand the utter foolishness of this foreign policy tragedy, and yet most politicians remain silent while the carnage continues and magnifies in scope. It is time for our political leadership to become just that. America stands today teetering upon a precipice perhaps as grave as any since 1865. We believe you understand this better than anyone, having been haunted for over a decade by the dark forces of the radical right, who seek to destroy this country while hiding behind a mask of piety and patriotism. We implore you now to call forth from yourselves the courage, patriotism and leadership America so sorely needs at this grave moment, and to lead us away from the abyss, before it is too late. The Iraq war is a tragedy and a disaster. It must end now, and - with the exception of one man in the Oval Office - no other Americans have a greater capacity to hasten that outcome than do you.... |
....Even within the "war on terror" community, Bioshield has proved controversial. That's because more than 80 percent of the nearly $1 billion allocated under the program has gone to a scandal-plagued company that has never successfully produced an FDA-licensed vaccine. In November 2004 California-based VaxGen was handed one of the largest government vaccine contracts in history. The company is largely known for its failed AIDS vaccine, and just a few months before VaxGen won the Bioshield contract, the Nasdaq took the unusual step of delisting it from trading because of financial irregularities. So why did it get the contract? "I have no idea why VaxGen was selected," admits Henderson, who remains chair of the influential Secretary's Advisory Council at HHS. "It's not for me to decide whether it's a good idea or not." But it was for Simonson and his staff. And as with many Bush Administration contracts, several signs point to cronyism as the deciding factor--among them: VaxGen CEO Lance Gordon is a longtime associate of one of Simonson's top deputies on Bioshield, Dr. Phil Russell, former chief of Army medical research.... |
"Californians rejected Governor Schwarzenegger's measures, his unnecessary election and the governor himself when they defeated every one of the measures on yesterday's ballot. The election was a denunciation of the concept of governor as celebrity marketer. It was the repudiation of corporate campaign cash and a dramatic rejection of corporations' and politicians' attempts to steal the initiative process from the people. "Schwarzenegger needs to apologize to Californians. Not just for wasting $50 million of the taxpayers' money, but also for claiming he did not need anyone else's money and then collecting $70 million in corporate contributions. He needs to apologize for accepting cash from interest groups who had business on his desk and for flying around the country to fundraise when he should have been governing. He has to apologize for turning into the politician he encouraged Californians to throw out two years ago. "Governor Schwarzenegger rose and fell based on the power of populism. The nurses, cops, teachers, and firefighters beat Arnold by displaying their humanity. Californians didn't buy the Governor's attacks against public servants. Instead Californians said these public servants are the true action heroes who protect the public. Voters weren't willing to relinquish power to a celebrity governor with a grudge and 70 million dollars in corporate cash. "In turning back Schwarzenegger's initiatives, Californians also denied the corporate and ideological conservatives an opportunity to claim popular allegiance to their agenda. Both the Chamber of Commerce and national right-wing activists hoped to use this election as a galvanizing tool for initiatives throughout the country and further rollbacks of citizen, consumer and worker rights. With a resounding 'no,' big industry was told that even a hundred million dollars can't sell their out-of-the-mainstream agenda. "Now, a real reform agenda must be embraced. And the Governor as well as Democrats and Republicans in the statehouse, must address the issues that Californians actually care about, but the politicians are afraid to talk about: the need for getting money out of politics and publicly financing elections; the high cost of healthcare and the lack of universal health coverage; gas prices; the real problems with public education and our broken energy system. "If Governor Schwarzenegger walks away from the election to more world-record fundraising and cash-register politics, then it will be clear he does not understand what the voters said in the 2003 recall and reiterated last night." |
I apologize for the slow-loading today. From what I can tell, the hit meter site (Sitemeter) is down and causing very slow page loading as Blogger tries to connect. I may just inactivate it if the problem persists.
Thanks to thousands of emails from UCS activists like you, and support from other residents across the state, the California Air Resources Board voted unanimously to set a 5-minute idling limit for diesel trucks that typically idle overnight! Trucking companies will now equip their sleeper cabs with cleaner, smaller engines or non-diesel alternatives to power air conditioning, heating, and other amenities for sleeping truckers. Thanks to this new rule, California will save over 100 million gallons of diesel fuel a year, prevent more than 700,000 tons of global warming emissions and thousands of tons of toxic and smog-forming air pollution from being emitted every year, and save truckers a small fortune in fuel costs. |
"Iraq War was a war of choice." - - - Richard Haass, President of the Council on Foreign Relations |
JOHN GARAMENDI'S SPECIAL ELECTION VOTER GUIDE Prop 74 - NO! Punishes New Teachers Prop 75 - NO! Paycheck Deception Act Prop 76 - NO! Cuts School Funding and Ends the Balance of Power Prop 77 - NO! Arnold’s Reapportionment Power Grab Prop 78 - NO! The Drug Companies’ Bad Prescription Initiative Prop 79 - YES The Cheaper Prescription Drugs for Californians Act Prop 80 - YES The Affordable Electricity and Prevent Blackouts Act In Los Angeles VOTE "YES" on LAUSD Measure Y |
"O Lord our Father, our young patriots, idols of our hearts, go forth to battle -- be Thou near them! With them -- in spirit -- we also go forth from the sweet peace of our beloved firesides to smite the foe. O Lord our God, help us to tear their soldiers to bloody shreds with our shells; help us to cover their smiling fields with the pale forms of their patriot dead; help us to drown the thunder of the guns with the shrieks of their wounded, writhing in pain; help us to lay waste their humble homes with a hurricane of fire; help us to wring the hearts of their unoffending widows with unavailing grief; help us to turn them out roofless with little children to wander unfriended the wastes of their desolated land in rags and hunger and thirst, sports of the sun flames of summer and the icy winds of winter, broken in spirit, worn with travail, imploring Thee for the refuge of the grave and denied it -- for our sakes who adore Thee, Lord, blast their hopes, blight their lives, protract their bitter pilgrimage, make heavy their steps, water their way with their tears, stain the white snow with the blood of their wounded feet! We ask it, in the spirit of love, of Him Who is the Source of Love, and Who is the ever-faithful refuge and friend of all that are sore beset and seek His aid with humble and contrite hearts. Amen." |
"There's an enemy that lurks and plots and plans and wants to hurt America again. So you bet we will aggressively pursue them but we will do so under the law. We do not torture." - - - Pres. Bush, today |